Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br />l~ <br />,,(;11 <br />',""" <br />...,., <br />I:w <br /> <br />'.<"1 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />',"~oj <br />, <br /> <br />,,: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />6! <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />. :~ <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />:'t <br /> <br />'I' <br />~. -~ <br /> <br />.' ;. <br /> <br />'/' <br />t\ <br />, "~ <br />{ ;: <br />?'; <br /> <br />'y <br /> <br />~:- ;. <br /> <br />~: : <br />:, <br />J <br />'. <br /> <br />. :1' <br /> <br />~::"{ <br />~,( <br />I <br />.;:}, <br />>.i <br /> <br />'( <br /> <br />i. <br /> <br />simulated results are in good agreement with recOrded data. Some <br />discrepancies, in the Green Mountain Reservoir contents during April <br />through June. a.re due to difficulties in duplicating' historical <br />power releas,e scheduleS whioh werehig'hly variable during this <br />period. <br /> <br />5.:2 PROJECT RESERVoIR YIEJ,DS <br /> <br />The hydrolog'ic simulation l\)odel was applied to estimate storable <br />water ,ateaohproposed reservoir site under the three developmemt <br />so.enarios discussed in section 3.0. Under each development <br />scenario, two different conditions for the. operation of Green <br />Mountain Reservoir were aSs,umed. One condition" referred t.o as <br />"wi thoutPumpback'l , assumes that Green Mountain ReServoir will <br />co!}tinue to operate in accordance with $enate Document 80. The <br />other condition aSsumes that water will be pumped from Green <br />Mountain Reservoir to Dillon Reservoir. This second condition <br />reflects one . of the. alternatives envisioned under the Green <br />Mountain Reservoir Exchange concept. Two alternative' pumpback <br />capacities were studied. The "154,000 Pumpback", alternative <br />assumes that the entire storage of Green Mountain neservoir, <br />(approximately 154,000 af) be made available for pumpback to Dillon <br />Reservoir except for the required 60 cfs minimum flow requirement. <br />The. other alternative analyzed in. this study assumes that the <br />active storage of 52,000 at' be kept in Green Mountain Reservoir to <br />be used to satisfy CBT out-of-priority diversions, while the <br />remaining power pool l;>e used to supply water to Dillon ReserVoir. <br />This alternative is referred to as "100,000 PUmpback". <br /> <br />Subsequl;!nt to the hydrOlogic . analysis which provided estimates of, <br />storable flows , the. reservoir operation analysis was performed to <br />estimate the firm annual yield of each reservoir. The firm annual <br />yield is defined .for the purpoSe of this study as the constant <br />vOlUme of water tha.t can be supplied every year without any <br />shortage during th.e study period of 1951 through 1.983. It was <br /> <br />,5-8 <br />