Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B48 <br /> <br />DROUGHT IN THE SOUTHWEST, 1942-56 <br /> <br />dini, we were told that similar plants in other sections of the <br />United States were producing as much as 8 milUon gallons a <br />day of liquid industrial waste. Because of the hazard of water <br />pollution ana nUiStlllCe, we determined that these wastes could <br />not be discharged to the ground or to the draInage channels in <br />the vicinity of the proposed plant. Also, the limited capacity <br />of the .sanitary sew,er system precluded the discharge of such <br />quantities of waste from a single Industry. Finally, the cost of <br />water in the Los Angeles metropolitan area indicated tbat <br />wastage of the quantities mentioned would be unfeasible. <br />In this case the industry employed sanitary engineers who <br />were able to develop methods for reclamation and reuse of <br />water from various industrial operations to such an extent that <br />the plant is now wasting only 0.286 million gallons a day to the <br />sewer system .. .. ... <br />>/I ol< >/I We have <mcouraged many industrial plants including <br />industries manufacturing paints, synthetic rubber, automobiles, <br />aircraft, and hundr~s of other products to install facilities for <br />the treatment and reuse of process wastes. Of great interest <br />to us have been the changes at some of our major refineries <br />where management: and engineers have been actively engaged <br />in development of comprehensive programs for such reclama- <br />tion, reuse, and conservation of all available water lie lie "'. <br /> <br />In most of southern California the maintenance of <br />an adequate water supply throughout the dry years has <br />been achieved by importations, of which some have been <br />going on for a long time, For example, an aqueduct <br />has carried water from the Owens V alley to the city <br />of Los Angeles since 1913, and practically at its capacity <br />of 330,000 acre-feet per year since 1950, The Colorado <br />River aqueduct of the Metropolitan Water District <br />first delivered water to southern California in 1943; the <br />imports increased from 50,000 acre-feet in 1945 to <br />430,000 in 1956, These figures include the water car- <br />ried by the San Diego aqueduct, whose first barrel was <br />completed in 1947 and second barrel in 1954, The <br />Colorado River has been the sourCe also of progressively <br />increasing quantities of water for irrigation in Imperial <br />and Coachella Valleys, In the southern part of the <br />San Joaquin Valley, the Friant-Kern Canal began to <br />deliver water southward from t.he San Joaquin River <br />in 1949, and the deliveries increased progressively from <br />184,000 acre-feet in 1950 to 1,322,000 in 1956, The irri- <br />gat.ed area in the southern part. of t.he San Joaquin <br />VaHey increased.from 11h million acres in 1945 t.onearly <br />2 million acres in 1955, <br />In t.he south coastal area which includes the metro- <br />politan areas of Los Angeles and San Diego, t.he irri- <br />gat.ed acreage decreased substant.ially during the <br />drought., but there the agricultural land was a casualty <br />in the increasing urbanization, as shown by the figures <br />for the heavily urbanized and industrialized Los <br />Angeles County, beginning as early as 1920. (See.fol- <br />lowing table,) <br />It is likely that, had there been no urbanization, some <br />agricultural land would have been forced out of pro- <br />duction during the drought because of increasing cost <br /> <br />of wat.er. The prices of wat.er have risen because of in- <br />creasing pumping lift., increasing need for artificial <br />recharge of ground~water reservoirs, and increasing <br />costs of storage and importation of surface water, The <br />municipal and industrial users of water pay more pel' <br />acre-foot of water than most farmers can afford at <br />present prices for crops, <br /> <br />Irrigate(l area, in thousands of acres, in California's south coastal <br />basin <br /> <br />[Figures lor l000--fiO rounded from U.S. Census; lor 19M rounded Irom Agricultural <br />Department 01 Los Angeles Oha.mber of Commerce <br />County llJ1XJ 1910 1920 1980 1940 1950 1954 <br />Los Angeles_ _ __~.u__~__~__u____________ 86 146 248 206 185 184 147 <br />San Dernardlno.__._.~____~_u__u________ 38 70 10' lOB 111 107 102 <br />Orangc_ _ ____~__"_U_______u__________"__ 42 .. 87 112 11. 12. 101 <br />San DJego________________________________ 15 25 25 43 52 .. 63 <br /> - - <br />Total__.______uu______________u.. 195 296 46' 46' 467 472 413 <br /> <br />The; increasing water cost has been borne especially <br />by the newcomers to the Stat.e, who have been respons- <br />ible for expanding urbanization and industrialization <br />and who upon arrival found the local supplies of sur- <br />face and ground wat.er already developed and in use. <br />To many of these immigrants, the only water available <br />for t.heir requirement.s was relatively expensive im- <br />ported wat.er. For many long-established users of the <br />local water supplies t.he cost of water increased during <br />t.he drought, as ground-water storage was deplet.ed, <br />Some of the increased cost resulted from purchase of <br />import.ed wat.er, which was used for artificial recharge <br />of the deplet.ed ground-wat.er reservoirs (Thomas and <br />others, 1963d) , <br /> <br />ALLOCATION OF WATER <br />By H: E. THOMAS <br />Regulation of the development and use of water has <br />been influenced by drought in som~places in the South- <br />west, Legal and administrative controls are effected <br />through some form of allocation or apportionment of <br />the water wherever there has been competition and con- <br />troversy over it. Thus allocat.ion is made necessary <br />by water shortage, whether the shortage is created by <br />aridity, by drought, or by such artificial fact.ors as con- <br />centrat.ed draft or excessive demand, Because of <br />drought, it may be necessary to apportion supplies <br />which under normal conditions would be ample for all <br />requirements. Also, drought provides an excellent. test <br />of. the efficacy of the systems of allocation t.hat have <br />been devised in various areas, The following discus- <br />sion therefore includes some consideration of the <br />strengths and weaknesses of various devices of alloca- <br />tion as pointed up by the drought, as well as mention of <br />modifications in systems of allocation during the <br />drought. <br />The bases for allocation of water in the Southwest are <br />contained in statutes, court decisions, administrative <br />