<br />~";J1335
<br />'j ". .
<br />
<br />GENERAL EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON WATER RESOURCES
<br />
<br />B31
<br />
<br />ing the 1930's was generally less than during either the
<br />1892-1904 or the 1943-56 drought. Figure 8 also shows
<br />that the trends in yearly runoff of Colorado River at
<br />Lees Ferry, Ariz., have been similar to those of streams
<br />in the San .r uan Mountains. This station was not in-
<br />cluded in the statistical studies for this report., because
<br />t.he basin extends beyond the Sout.hwest. drought area as
<br />previously defined and because the runoff from the
<br />1l0,000-square-mile basin has been considerably modi-
<br />fied by man.
<br />The stations in the Great Plains include one group
<br />along t.he flanks of the southern Rocky Mountains in
<br />cent.ral New Mexico and, several hundred miles to the
<br />southeast., three contiguons groups deep in the heart. of
<br />Texas. The'snbdivision int.o three groups in Texas has
<br />been necessary, because there is a wider range in runoff
<br />characteristics and lesser correlation between nearby
<br />stations than is common in t.he other met.eorological
<br />zones, The yearly runoff of four groups is shown on
<br />figure 9, The Upper Pecos River basin group shows
<br />effect.s of t.he droughts of 1909-18, 1930-40, and 1946-56,
<br />which have been recorded in the Great Plains farther
<br />eastward-in Kansas, Oklahoma, and the Texas Pan.
<br />handle (Thomas, 1962). The 2., 3-,5-, and 10-year
<br />periods of minimum runoff were all recorded in the last
<br />of these three drought. periods. In central Texas the
<br />three groups (west.-central, central, and south.cent.ral)
<br />show several similarities and also seve-ral divergences
<br />in the effect.s npon runoff of these several periods of
<br />drought in the Great Plains. The effect of" the 1909-18
<br />drought. upon all three gronps is shown to be marked.
<br />By contrast, the decade 1930-40 was not a period of
<br />marked reduction in runoff, although 1934 was general-
<br />ly a year of very low flow, In all three groups the re-
<br />cent drought has been more intense than the earlier
<br />droughts and resulted in the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year
<br />periods of minimum runoff in the period of record. The
<br />effect of this most recent drought was variable among
<br />the three groups of stations, however; two groups re-
<br />corded flow 'above the median in 1947-49, although the
<br />third group registered less than median flow in each of
<br />the years 1948-56,
<br />Several of the streams in central Texas drain areas
<br />that are underlain by the ground-water reservoir in the
<br />Edwards limestone (Thomas and others, 1963b), which
<br />effects the amount of runoff variously. Storage and
<br />delayed release of water mll,y account for the trend of
<br />annual runoff shown in the graphs representing the
<br />three groups in central Texas. To an extent greater
<br />than is indicated by the graphs in figures 6-9, the years
<br />of high runoff are commonly followed by a second year
<br />of relatively high runoff, and there are indications of a
<br />long.continued declining trend in runoff after years of
<br />maximum runoff, such as 1919 and 1935 (Thomas and
<br />
<br />others; 1963b). Plate 1 shows maps of the Southwest
<br />that delineate thea,reas where the annual runoff was
<br />less than the median for each of the years 1942-57.
<br />These areas are similar in major outline to the areas of
<br />precipitation deflciency in corresponding years (Thom-
<br />as, 1962). The inadequate coverage of the Southwest
<br />by the 85 selected gaging stations is evident from in-
<br />spection of the resulting maps, but more adequat<J data
<br />concerning this period of drought are not likely to be
<br />obtained.
<br />
<br />STREAMFLOW AS INDICATED' BY TREE RINGS
<br />
<br />The derivation of the median runoff in the base period
<br />1904-53 and the conclusions about the effects of drought
<br />in terms of deviation from this median lead logically
<br />to the following question: Where does this 50-year base
<br />period stand in relation to the period of occupancy of
<br />the Southwest by man? This question is analogous to
<br />that posed about climate generally in that we have a
<br />century of record that can be projected back to earlier
<br />centuries and millenniums, Studies of tree rings have
<br />provided some of the most definitive conclusions con-
<br />cerning the climat<J of the Southwest during these
<br />earlier centuries. Studies of tree rings also enable us
<br />to make intelligent deductions concerning streamflow
<br />in bygone centuries,
<br />Tree-ring studies for the Southwest drought area
<br />covered by this report, except for Texas, indicate that
<br />mean runoff during the base period 1904--53 was closely
<br />representative of mean runoff for the 1M-year period
<br />1800-1\153 and also for periods of 850 years or more.
<br />Thus the 50-year period was representative, despite the
<br />fact that runoff in the first part of the period was far
<br />above the mean and in the last part far below the mean;
<br />or perhaps it is more accurate to say that the 50-year
<br />runoff was representative, because the period included
<br />both high and low runoff periods, which happened to
<br />occur at about the proper time to give a representative
<br />average. The conclusion is that the figures presented
<br />in this report showing runoff deficiencies during the re-
<br />cent drought in terms of the 50-year (1904--53) median
<br />runoff show reasonably well the runoff deficiencies in
<br />terms of median runoff for much longer periods, In
<br />other words, the recent drought is a real drought; it is
<br />not, as has sometimes been conjectured, a period of nor-
<br />mal runoff following a great excess of runoff in the early
<br />part of this century.
<br />Schulman (1956, p, 65) has drawn several conclusions
<br />regarding specific areas of the Southwest from his tree-
<br />ring studies. He regards the present dronght in the
<br />Colorado River basin above Lees Ferry as having
<br />started about 1930, and he says of that basin:
<br />
<br />We may conclude that (1) the average departure during the
<br />interval 1300-1300, the wettest during the pOust eight centuries
<br />
|