Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~";J1335 <br />'j ". . <br /> <br />GENERAL EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />B31 <br /> <br />ing the 1930's was generally less than during either the <br />1892-1904 or the 1943-56 drought. Figure 8 also shows <br />that the trends in yearly runoff of Colorado River at <br />Lees Ferry, Ariz., have been similar to those of streams <br />in the San .r uan Mountains. This station was not in- <br />cluded in the statistical studies for this report., because <br />t.he basin extends beyond the Sout.hwest. drought area as <br />previously defined and because the runoff from the <br />1l0,000-square-mile basin has been considerably modi- <br />fied by man. <br />The stations in the Great Plains include one group <br />along t.he flanks of the southern Rocky Mountains in <br />cent.ral New Mexico and, several hundred miles to the <br />southeast., three contiguons groups deep in the heart. of <br />Texas. The'snbdivision int.o three groups in Texas has <br />been necessary, because there is a wider range in runoff <br />characteristics and lesser correlation between nearby <br />stations than is common in t.he other met.eorological <br />zones, The yearly runoff of four groups is shown on <br />figure 9, The Upper Pecos River basin group shows <br />effect.s of t.he droughts of 1909-18, 1930-40, and 1946-56, <br />which have been recorded in the Great Plains farther <br />eastward-in Kansas, Oklahoma, and the Texas Pan. <br />handle (Thomas, 1962). The 2., 3-,5-, and 10-year <br />periods of minimum runoff were all recorded in the last <br />of these three drought. periods. In central Texas the <br />three groups (west.-central, central, and south.cent.ral) <br />show several similarities and also seve-ral divergences <br />in the effect.s npon runoff of these several periods of <br />drought in the Great Plains. The effect of" the 1909-18 <br />drought. upon all three gronps is shown to be marked. <br />By contrast, the decade 1930-40 was not a period of <br />marked reduction in runoff, although 1934 was general- <br />ly a year of very low flow, In all three groups the re- <br />cent drought has been more intense than the earlier <br />droughts and resulted in the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year <br />periods of minimum runoff in the period of record. The <br />effect of this most recent drought was variable among <br />the three groups of stations, however; two groups re- <br />corded flow 'above the median in 1947-49, although the <br />third group registered less than median flow in each of <br />the years 1948-56, <br />Several of the streams in central Texas drain areas <br />that are underlain by the ground-water reservoir in the <br />Edwards limestone (Thomas and others, 1963b), which <br />effects the amount of runoff variously. Storage and <br />delayed release of water mll,y account for the trend of <br />annual runoff shown in the graphs representing the <br />three groups in central Texas. To an extent greater <br />than is indicated by the graphs in figures 6-9, the years <br />of high runoff are commonly followed by a second year <br />of relatively high runoff, and there are indications of a <br />long.continued declining trend in runoff after years of <br />maximum runoff, such as 1919 and 1935 (Thomas and <br /> <br />others; 1963b). Plate 1 shows maps of the Southwest <br />that delineate thea,reas where the annual runoff was <br />less than the median for each of the years 1942-57. <br />These areas are similar in major outline to the areas of <br />precipitation deflciency in corresponding years (Thom- <br />as, 1962). The inadequate coverage of the Southwest <br />by the 85 selected gaging stations is evident from in- <br />spection of the resulting maps, but more adequat<J data <br />concerning this period of drought are not likely to be <br />obtained. <br /> <br />STREAMFLOW AS INDICATED' BY TREE RINGS <br /> <br />The derivation of the median runoff in the base period <br />1904-53 and the conclusions about the effects of drought <br />in terms of deviation from this median lead logically <br />to the following question: Where does this 50-year base <br />period stand in relation to the period of occupancy of <br />the Southwest by man? This question is analogous to <br />that posed about climate generally in that we have a <br />century of record that can be projected back to earlier <br />centuries and millenniums, Studies of tree rings have <br />provided some of the most definitive conclusions con- <br />cerning the climat<J of the Southwest during these <br />earlier centuries. Studies of tree rings also enable us <br />to make intelligent deductions concerning streamflow <br />in bygone centuries, <br />Tree-ring studies for the Southwest drought area <br />covered by this report, except for Texas, indicate that <br />mean runoff during the base period 1904--53 was closely <br />representative of mean runoff for the 1M-year period <br />1800-1\153 and also for periods of 850 years or more. <br />Thus the 50-year period was representative, despite the <br />fact that runoff in the first part of the period was far <br />above the mean and in the last part far below the mean; <br />or perhaps it is more accurate to say that the 50-year <br />runoff was representative, because the period included <br />both high and low runoff periods, which happened to <br />occur at about the proper time to give a representative <br />average. The conclusion is that the figures presented <br />in this report showing runoff deficiencies during the re- <br />cent drought in terms of the 50-year (1904--53) median <br />runoff show reasonably well the runoff deficiencies in <br />terms of median runoff for much longer periods, In <br />other words, the recent drought is a real drought; it is <br />not, as has sometimes been conjectured, a period of nor- <br />mal runoff following a great excess of runoff in the early <br />part of this century. <br />Schulman (1956, p, 65) has drawn several conclusions <br />regarding specific areas of the Southwest from his tree- <br />ring studies. He regards the present dronght in the <br />Colorado River basin above Lees Ferry as having <br />started about 1930, and he says of that basin: <br /> <br />We may conclude that (1) the average departure during the <br />interval 1300-1300, the wettest during the pOust eight centuries <br />