Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />., " .. <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />Even it etation looation haa remained unohanged, a long-term record <br />may involve progressive bias owing to continual changes in the environ~ , <br />ment. For example, over the years more and more of the waters in a given' <br />river basin may have been diverted for use, and streamflows may have . <br />been regulated more and more by construction of successive reservoirs. <br />E\'en if available, a record of such diversions commonly does not show <br />all the effect on streamflow} for eX1\lllPle, a substantial fraction of the <br />water diverted may return to the stream far below the point of diversion. <br />Similarly, owing to evaporation and ~ther losses that commorily are not <br />measured, records of reservoir inflow, content, and outflow yield a <br />distorted measure of the regulating effect. <br /> <br />SOMe effects of major diversions and regulation may be documented <br />in supplemental water records, so that gaging-station records can be <br />adjusted accordingly. The "remarks"section of the record in Water- <br />Supply Papers should be scanned for relevant clues} some but not all <br />environmental changes will be identified there. Both increasing water- <br />s'1Xface area in reservoirs and increasing use of water deplete streamflow; <br />usually, such depletions are not documented. Also not usually documented, <br />numerous SMall diversions may, have be.en made successiveJ,y, small but <br />significant quantities of water may bY-pass gaging stations, and numerous <br />other works of man may have added some effect. Changes in pattern of <br />land use commonly have been large over a long term of years and are <br />claimed widely to have caused substantial changes in the yield of water <br />to streams. That such change has occurred is likely; the magnitude of <br />change, apart from variability owing to natural causes, commonly is <br />difficult to demonstrate. <br /> <br />In this connection, emphasis perhaps is warranted in regard to the <br />effects of dikes, levees, and other river-training works. Commonly these <br />works are constructed progressively in a particular stream basin. Asa <br />result, stage at some key station'may seem to rise progressively over <br />many years, not because the basin yields more water but because training <br />works upstream constrain a greater a~d greater portion of the flow to <br />the main channel, or training works downstream cause higher and higher <br />backwater, or both. Effects may reach many miles frOM the works that <br />cause them} they may be large and relatively obvious, or small and <br />obscure. Commonly neither their'magnitude nor'their timing can-be <br />discriminated precisely. Failure of a levee or other training work <br />reverses the, effect. <br /> <br />Such change may occur not only in agricultural and rural areas but <br />also in urban and industrial areas. For example, in the urban-industrial <br />enviro!m1ent the rate and volume of storm runoff, the volume of fluid <br />w!\stes, and stream temperatures are likely to iricrease--perhaps substlln- <br />t:l,ally and at times sharply, but in most instances gradually and <br />obscurely. Ground-water levels and potential yields are likely to be <br />affected, and commonly depressed. <br />