Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />collected at an ungaged site, Yampa River at Canyon Entrance, to check the <br />accuracy of measurements made at the Deerlodge Park site. The channel at the <br />Canyon Entrance site, which is confined by bedrock and talus, provides a good <br />hydraulic control for water and sediment-discharge measurements. <br /> <br />Suspended sediment was collected at station 09260050 Yampa River at <br />Deerlodge Park at verticals spaced every 15 ft across the channel with a DH-48 <br />or 0-74 depth-integrating sampler (Guy and Norman, 1970). Observed <br />suspended-sediment concentrations varied from 137 mg/L to 5,600 mg/L. Bedload <br />was collected at 15-ft intervals across the channel at the Deerlodge Park site <br />using a Helley-Smith bedload sampler (Helley and Smith, 1971; Emmett, 1980). <br />Bed-material samples were collected with a pipe dredge (6-in. diameter) at <br />50-ft intervals along the cross section. Concentrations and size distribu- <br />tions of suspended sediment collected at station 09260050 Yampa River at <br />Deerlodge Park are shown in table 8. Size distributions of bed material are <br />shown in table 9 and size distributions of bedload are shown in table 10. <br />Discharge, hydraulic-geometry and sediment.size data from station 09260000 <br />Little Snake River near Lily are shown in table 11, and similar data from the <br />ungaged site, Yampa River at Canyon Entrance, are shown in table 12. Tables <br />8-12 are presented in the Supplemental Data section at the end of the report. <br /> <br />Sediment discharges in the Yampa River at Deerlodge Park were computed <br />from 33 measurements made over a range of discharges. Suspended-sediment <br />di scharge in the sampled zone was computed from the mean di sCharge-wei ghted <br />sediment concentration, the measured water discharge, and a unit conversion <br />constant (Porterfield, 1972). A correction factor to acco.unt for the percent- <br />age of streamflow actually sampled with the depth-integrating sampler was <br />applied to the computation of discharge of suspended particles that would also <br />be collected near the bed in the Helley-Smith sampler (particle diameters <br />larger than 0.25 mm), (Colby, and Hembree, 1955). Bedload discharge was <br />computed by dividing the dried sample weight by the total sample time and by <br />the width of the Helley-Smith sampler orifice (0.25 ft),' and multiplying by <br />the channel width. Total.sediment discharge was determined as the sum of <br />suspended-sediment di scharge and bedload di scharge. Size di stri buti ons of <br />suspended sediment (table 8) and bedload (table 10) were combined with the <br />appropriate suspended-sediment discharge and bedload discharge to compute <br />sediment discharges by size range. Water discharge, total sediment discharge, <br />suspended-sediment discharge, bedload discharge, and the total sediment <br />discharge in several size categories are presented in table 13 in the Supple- <br />mental Data section at the end of the report. <br /> <br />The size distribution of material transported by the Yampa River at <br />Deerlodge Park is summarized in table 2. Most of the riverbed consisted of <br />sand-size material during all discharge measurements in 1982 and 1983. 80th <br />the bed material of the channel and the bedload were predominantly medium-to- <br />coarse sands. The average of median grain sizes (dso) for bed-material <br />samples was 0.61 mm, and for bedload was 0.57 mm. Bed-material samples that <br />included minor amoLlnts of gravel were highly skewed. Suspended sediment at <br />the Deerlodge Park site varied considerably in size distribution. Silt- and <br />clay-size material (sediment finer than 0.062 mm) comprised 10 to 92 percent <br />of the total suspended-sediment discharge; the mean was 60 percent and the <br />standard deviation was 23.7 percent. The remainder of suspended sediment was <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />