My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10382
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10382
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
1
Date
6/27/1984
Author
USGS
Title
Sediment Transport in Lower Yampa River, Northwestern Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 1.--Hgdraulic geometrg relations at station Q9260050 Yampa River <br />at Daerlodge Park <br /> <br />[W, channel width in feet; 5, mean depth in feet; a, mean velocity in feet <br />per second; Af' cross-sectional area in square feet; Q, instantaneous <br />discharge in cubic feet per second; R2, coefficient of determination; <br />SE, standard error of estimate in percent; n, sample size] <br /> <br /> <br />Regression equation R2 SE n <br />W = 178 QO.OS9____________~-------- 0.18 12 35 <br />5 = 0.0227 QO.64___________________ .96 13 35 <br />, <br />Q = 0.251 QO.30____________________ .91 9 35 <br />Af = 4.04 QO.70_____________________ .98 10 35 <br /> <br />Water surface slope varied about a mean of 0.00069, with standard deviation of <br />0.00014 and n of 12. <br /> <br />at the Maybell and Lily gages. Linear regression of log-transformed discharge <br />data resulted in the equation: <br /> <br />QO = 1.74 QrO.94, R2 = 0.98, SE = 18 , <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />Qo = daily mean discharge of Yampa River at Oeerlodge Park, in <br />ft3/s, <br />Qr = sum of daily mean discharges of Yampa River near Maybell <br />and Little Snake River near Lily, in ft3/s, <br />R2 = coefficient of determination, and <br />SE = standard error of estimate, in percent. <br /> <br />The regression equation gives about the same answer as simply summing the <br />upstream discharges when the discharge at Oeerlodge Park is about 10,000 <br />ft3/s. However, when the discharge at Deerlodge Park is near 400 ft3/s, the <br />equation overestimates discharge by about 25 percent. Consequently, historic <br />discharges at the Deerlodge Park gage were estimated by summing historic <br />discharges of the' '{amp a River near ;"1aybel] gage and the Little Snake River <br />neat' Lily gage. The historic hydrograph of mean daily discharges for the <br />Yampa River at Deerlodge Park is presented in figure 5. <br /> <br />Water years 1982 and 1983 were characterized by high peak discharges, and <br />above-average annual streamfl ows. The 1982 instantaneous peak di scharge at <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.