My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10371
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10371
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:17:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8111.805
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration - Keesee Ditch
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1986
Author
HRS Engineering
Title
Keesee Ditch Change of Water Rights Vol 1 - Historical Operation of Kessee Ditch
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />mSTORICAL STREAM DEPLETION <br /> <br />The purpose of this engineering analysis is to determine the historical depletions <br />to the Arkansas River resulting from the operation of the Keesee Ditch. These <br />historical depletions are the net effect of diversions, consumptive use and irrigation <br />return flows. The results of the analysis will provide a historical pattern for these <br />components which can be matched by a similar pattern of storage, exchange and <br />releases from John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />A 20-year study period from 1964 through 1983 was selected for the analysis. <br />This study period incorporates the recent pattern of irrigation use by the Keesee <br />Ditch, including a stable pattern of irrigated acreage and crop types, the effects <br />of John Martin Reservoir operation and the development of ground water resources <br />along the Arkansas River. A 20-year study period was also considered optimum <br />for the incluSion of most short-term climatic fluctuations based on research of <br />climatic cycles in Colorado (Doesken, 1986, pers. comm.) <br /> <br />In order to calculate the amount and timing of historical stream depletions, <br />the analysis was divided into two major components: an analysis of consumptive <br />use to determine the amount of irrigation water permanently removed from the <br />stream system or "consumed", and an analysis of irrigation return flows. The <br />consumptive Use analysis was a monthly water budget which incorporated data <br />related to irrigated acreage, crop irrigation water requirements, diversions, <br />irrigation system losses, and soil moisture storage. The irrigation return flow <br />analysis incorporated characteristics of the alluvial ground water system to route <br />return flows from delivery system losses and excess irrigation water back to the <br />river. The amount and timing of return flows were then combined with the records <br />of diversions to determine the net effect on the river or the "historical stream <br />depletion". Figure 2 is a simplified illustration of the movement of irrigation <br />water through the Keesee Ditch system. <br /> <br />Since surface and ground water irrigation supplies were commingled within <br />the ditch distribution system, no particular irrigated acreage benefited exclusively <br />from either source. As a means of separating historical depletions attributable <br />to the ditch water rights from the effects of the Broyles irrigation wells, it was <br />assumed that the ditch diversions were limited to the irrigation of a total of 1400 <br />acres, as decreed. The remaining irrigated acreage (about 500 acres), and any <br /> <br />...t.-'.').{ <br />,. r <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.