Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />include less than a mile of new transmission line along the base of a hill- <br />side composed of big sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and juniper. Less than 1 acre of <br />this native vegetation would be cleared. <br /> <br />E. Endangered Species <br /> <br />Consultation with the Fish and Wildlife under Section 7 of the <br />Endangered Species Act resulted in a jeopardy opinion on the Colorado squaw- <br />fish, humpback chub, and bony tail chub. As a part of the biological opinion, <br />Fish and Wildlife provided alternatives to Reclamation that, if implemented, <br />would preclude jeopardy to the three endangered fishes. The Bureau of Reclama- <br />tion has reviewed the operational flexibility of the CRSP system and finds <br />that through regulation of the system, it can maintain the seasonal flow <br />pattern of the Colorado River that exists without the Dallas Creek Project. <br /> <br />F. Social and Economic Factors <br /> <br />The inclusion of power in the project would not adversely affect <br />the economic position of other project purposes; in fact, an additional <br />purpose would lighten the cost burden of other purposes. Power generated at <br />Ridgway Dam would be integrated into the Colorado River Storage Project <br />system. The Storage Project would market the power and pay all power-allocated <br />costs. Reimbursable project costs include construction and interest for munic- <br />ipal and industrial water, power, construction costs allocated to irrigation, <br />and all annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs. <br /> <br />Construction would create an additional 19 jobs and provide approx- <br />imately $407,000 in direct income to those workers and the area during the <br />initial year and 25 positions and $535,000 in the peak year. This additional <br />basic income would generate additional demand in other sections of the economy <br />increasing secondary employment opportunities by 29 to 3a positions. Increased <br />population is expected to'reach 28; of this, six are projected to be school-age <br />children. <br /> <br />The impact of the addition is expected to be less than that projected <br />for the no-power plan. This is due to the lengthening of the project construc- <br />tion period from 5 to 9 years. This has the effect of distributing expenditures <br />more evenly and allowing natural growth of the area to replace the emigrating <br />construction workers. Final expenditures vary among alternatives but are <br />beneficial by creating a more gentle decline in construction activity. <br /> <br />G. Cultural Resources <br /> <br />Twenty-three historic or prehistoric sites and one isolated find <br />have been located in the area between Ridgway Dam and Cow Creek. These <br />sites were located during surveys "of the Dallas Creek Project.l1 Eight <br />of the 23 sites have been mitigated as of September 1980 and no further work <br />is recommended for seven. The remainder of the sites will be mitigated as <br />part of the Dallas Creek Project, probably in the 1981 field season. The <br />hydropower alternative would have no effect on these sites. <br /> <br />1/ Breternitz <br />1978;-Moore, 1980. <br /> <br />and Adams, 1972; <br />(See Chapter IV, <br /> <br />Carpenter and <br />Section B for <br /> <br />Stiger, 1975; Baker, <br />complete references.) <br />