|
<br />.
<br />
<br /> Table 1
<br /> Comparison of alternatives
<br />Intake elevations Alt 1 Alt 2 AlL 3 Alt. 4 Alt. 5 AlL 6
<br />River 6,720 6,720 6,720 6,720 6,720 6,720
<br />High 6,810 6,810 6,alO 6,a30
<br />Multilevel 6,790
<br />Project Costs (Jan. '81)
<br />River 9,036,000 9,036,000 9,036,000 9,036,000 9,036,000 9,036,000
<br />High 2,225,000 2,225,000 2,225,000
<br />Mult ilevel 12,155,000
<br />Powerplant 5,452,000 5,452,000 5,452,000 5,452,000
<br />Aerators (Alt. #7) 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000
<br />Annual power (KWh) 0 19,240 11,910 0 19,240 19,240
<br />Annual power (benefits) 0 807,000 299,000 807,000 a07,OOO a07,OOO
<br />Annual recreation
<br />reductions 0 18,000 18,000 0 18,000 18,000
<br />Average surface area
<br />(May-September) 922 896 896 922 896 a96
<br />Average temperature range.!J
<br />April-May 40-51 39-45 40-51 39-45 38-:45 42-51
<br />June-August 53-66 49-66 53-66 48-66 48-66 55-64
<br />!J For any aeration alternative, add l' F. in Apri 1 and May and 3' F. for June, July, and August.
<br />
|