My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10325
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:16:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.100.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1999
Author
CRBSCF
Title
Supplemental Report on the 1999 Review - Water Quality Standards for Salinity - Colorado River System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /><::) <br />I-'- <br />en <br />00 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Supplemental Report on the 1999 Review. Water Quality Standards for Salinity. <br />Colorado River System, contains statements and comments received by the Forum and the Forum's <br />responses. Statements and comments were received at public meetings held in Los Angeles, <br />California on August 23, 1999 and in Lyman, Wyoming on August 24, 1999. Written comments <br />received by August 20,1999 were also accepted. This supplement also includes the correction of <br />typographical errors or deletions. All written comments or statements received by August 20 are <br />included as a part of this supplemental report. All oral comments received at the public meetings <br />were considered. It was determined that nearly all comments given orally that were related to the <br />1999 Review were supportive of the Review and the general thrust of the comments was represented <br />by written statements of others. Thus, these oral comments will not be repeated in this supplemental <br />report. However, one oral comment was received stating that the numeric criteria should be <br />reviewed to determine whether the criteria should be lowered and a response to this oral statement <br />is included in the Forum Response section of this report. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.