Laserfiche WebLink
<br /><=> <br />I-' <br />-.J <br />()t <br /> <br />In summary, it is the belief of the Forum that it must keep its focus on cost effective salinity <br />control and not assume obligations to address particular constituents such as selenium. However, <br />the Forum will continue to encourage cost shared partnerships that control salinity and also mitigate <br />other environmental concerns, with special attention given to selenium control possibilities. Over <br />the next three years, prior to the 2002 Triennial Review, the Forum will evaluate the role it might <br />play in addressing selenium problems. <br /> <br />Review of Numeric Criteria to Determine Whether Criteria Should be Lowered <br /> <br />The Mono Lake Committee and the Education for Sustainable Living comments given orally <br />at the Los Angeles meeting included a statement that the numeric criteria should be reviewed to <br />determine if the criteria should be lowered. One of the purposes for the triennial review effort is to <br />review the numeric criteria. This has been done during each of the triennial review efforts and it was <br />done in connection with the 1999 Review. In fact, in the 1999 Review, the Forum chose to, for the <br />first time, include a separate chapter, Chapter 3, on the numeric criteria. On page 3-4 of the Review, <br />the statement is made that "the Forum finds the current numeric criteria are adequate and that no <br />changes are required at this time." This statement is part ofa section of the chapter in the Review <br />that is entitled "Review ofthe Numeric Criteria." In the section, the review ofthe numeric criteria <br />is explained. The Forum can review the numeric criteria at any time and most certainly will review <br />the criteria in connection with the next review, the 2002 Review. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />1~2 <br />