Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Salinity Control in the Big Sandy Unit <br /> <br />o <br />~ <br />-.:.E <br />rv <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Zakotnik provided testimony in behalf ofthe Eden Valley Irrigation & Drainage <br />District., Mr. Zakotnik contended that as USDA has ,proceeded with its Big Sandy "Project," that <br />from 1989 until 1997 there has been an increase in tons of salt coming from the project. He quoted <br />from the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Big Sandy Rock Sills Project dated March <br />1999 and prepared by Reclamation. It appears that Mr. Zakotnik has confused the USDA "project" <br />with other projects. He correctly points out that the EA states that salinity contributions have <br />increased since the construction of the project, however the EA does not refer to the salinity control <br />project. The project referred to in the EA is the long-ago constructed Eden Project built by <br />Reclamation. The EA was prepared to evaluate and disclose the environmental consequences of <br />expanding a cooperative agreement with Trout Unlimited that provides for work to enhance 41 miles <br />of stream channel. The EA states that salinity had increased as a result of the construction of the Big <br />Sandy Reservoir and associated irrigation. <br /> <br />Studies have documented that salt control is occurring in the USDA project as planned. The <br />following is a table that summarizes the results of the onfarm program as reported by USDA in <br />Monitoring and Evaluation reports that have been prepared each year since the beginning of the <br />USDA salinity control effort. <br /> <br />Big Sandy Unit of the USDA Colorado River Salinity Control Program (now EQIP) <br /> <br />Data as Reported In the Natural Resources Conservation Service's Monitoring and Evaluation Reports for the Big <br />Sandy Unit of the Colorado River Salinity Control Program <br /> <br />Federal Cumulative Systems - Cumulative Reduction in Cumulative <br />Fiscal Number and Acreage Deep Percolation Salt Load Reduction <br />iB: Acre-feet Dar year Tons oer year <br />1998 105 and 8,327 11,791 30,657 <br />1997 101 and 7,983 11.496 29,890 <br />1996 81 and 6904 9,790 25.454 <br />1995 79 and 6682 9,477 24,641 <br />1994 72 and 5896 8,582 22,313 <br />1993 60 and 4993 7,222 18,774 <br />1992 38 and 3,263 4,831 12,557 <br />1991 25 and 2,162 3,246 8,440 <br />1990 12 and 1,175 1,896 4,931 <br /> <br />The table shows that from the beginning of the USDA salinity control project at Big Sandy <br />through the 1998 fiscal year, 105 systems have been improved. These systems irrigate 8,327 acres. <br />From the total effort through 1998, there has been a reduction ofll,791 acre-feet of deep percolation <br />per year. That has resulted in a total reduction of 30,657 tons of salt loading from the Big Sandy <br />area per year. <br /> <br />Mr. Zakotnik's letter also addressed the fact that the Big Sandy Project is not an integrated <br />project with both Reclamation and USDA components and that the 1999 Review report (at page 4-3) <br />noted that the two programs have purposely been designed to be highly integrated. The Forum notes <br /> <br />8 <br />