My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10317
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
12/5/1976
Author
USGS
Title
Surface-Water Quality in the Yampa River Basin - Colorado and Wyoming - An Area of Accelerated Coal Development
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />002855 <br /> <br />Conditions at Y-76 appear to be an artifact of the high velocities asso- <br />ciated with the outflow of Yampa Reserv0ir (fig. 1). The total biomass of <br />99 g/m2 (wet weight) measured at this site consisted of 99 percent (by num- <br />bers) black fly larvae. The next highest biomass value measured in the basin <br />on a Surber sample was 21.6 g/m2, and 59 of 61 determinations in the basin <br />were 12.6 g/m2 or less. <br /> <br />The low value of d (0.21) at site Y-48 may at first be thought to result <br />from the coal-stripping operation above this point, and indeed this may be at <br />least partly true. However, at site Y-49, above the stripping operation, the <br />value of d is still only 1.19. These generally low values of d probably are <br />influenced by the very low streamf10ws (estimated to be 0.1 and 0.01 ft3/s or <br />0.003 and 0.0003 m3/s, respectively) at sites Y-48 and Y-49. <br /> <br />At site Y-24, high values of periphyton biomass were noted in addition <br />to the low value of d. However, none of the nutrients occurred in excessive <br />concentrations at this site. <br /> <br />Three sites (Y-26, Y-46, and Y-68) were designated previously as anoma- <br />lous based upon the outlier analysis of observed trace-element concentrations <br />in water. The d value at site Y-26 was 2.28, giving it a "moderate pollution" <br />designation based upon the Wilhm-Dorris index. The bottom conditions at <br />sites Y-46 and 68 made the collection of a Surber sample impossible. <br /> <br />AMBIENT STREAM QUALITY <br /> <br />Based on the preceding data analysis, the maximum likely ambient concen- <br />trations of selected chemical constituents in streams in the Yampa River basin <br />have been determined. Application of this procedure in this context was first <br />used by Wentz (1974b) for detecting impacts of metal mining on Colorado <br />streams. The maximum likely limit for ambient concentrations in streams is <br />defined herein for each constituent as x + 2s (mean plus twice the standard <br />deviation for data obtained at unperturbed sites during low-flow conditions in <br />August and September 1975. A summary of these maximum concentrations of con- <br />stituents, so determined, is given in table 1. <br /> <br />RELATED ONGOING STUDIES <br /> <br />Knowledge of ambient stream quality in the Yampa River basin forms the <br />basis from which to evaluate potential water-quality impacts of coal-resource <br />and related economic development. The following is a brief overview of relat- <br />ed ongoing studies designed to examine these potential impacts. Specific re- <br />sults from these investigations will be topics of subsequent Yampa River <br />basin-assessment proj ect reports. Additional studies supported by other Fed- <br />eral, State, and local agencies will serve to complement the basin-assessment <br />studies mentioned here (see, for example, U.S. Geological Survey, 1976; Eddy, <br />[976) . <br /> <br />Based upon a range of projected coal-mining production levels in the <br />basIn for the year 1990, coal has been allocated among the following uses: <br />(1) Utilization by thermal-power generation or coal-gasification plants, (2) <br />transport out of the basin by rail or slurry pipeline, and (3) in-basin <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />, ~ <br /> <br />! <br />;;h<;-;li <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.