Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002847 <br /> <br />Utilizing actual streamflow and water-quality records for sites on the <br />Yampa River near Maybell and Little Snake River near Lily, time-trend analyses <br />were carried out using a set of annual mean values of specific conductance at <br />each site as a function of stream discharge and adjusting for streamflow ef- <br />fects. This procedure is documented by Steele, Gilroy, and Hawkinson (1974) <br />and utilizes the Kendall's Tau nonparametric statistical test on each ranked <br />annual time series (Conover, 1971). Using data for the 1951-72 water-year <br />period of record, a significant long-term increase in specific conductance of <br />14 percent was observed for the Yampa River (Steele and others, 1974, table 9, <br />p. 67); however, no significant change was observed for the Little Snake River. <br />The trend in increasing salinity for the Yampa River is attributed to increas- <br />ing demands using surface water for agricultural and municipal purposes. <br />Using a shorter period of record (1951-63 water years), no significant changes <br />at either of these two sites were reported in a study by the Colorado River <br />Basin Water Quality Control Project (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1970, <br />table 1). <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />To demonstrate seasonal variability of stream quality, figure 7 indicates <br />the fluctations in observed specific conductance and stream discharge at site <br />Y-47 (fig. 1) from August 1975 to September 1976. The pronounced increase in <br />discharge with corresponding decrease in specific conductance from April <br />through July is typical year after year and elsewhere in the basin. <br /> <br />Stream-reach profiles of specific conductance for the mainstem Yampa and <br />Little Snake Rivers are shown in figure 8. Data for the Yampa River were col- <br />lected only downstream to site Y-O (river mife 46 or km 74) during the August- <br />September 1975 reconnaissance. At this point the river enters a steep-sided <br />canyon in Dinosaur National Monument (fig. 1), and access to the lower reaches <br />of the river is restricted until it enters the Green River. In August 1976, <br />a reconnaissance of the lower Yampa River was conducted during low-flow condi- <br />tions to assess the water quality of that part of the Yampa River in Dinosaur <br />National Monument. Specific-conductance values at river mile 46 (km 74) for <br />the 2 years agreed quite well (460 and 445 ~mhos/cm at 250C for 1975 and 1976, <br />respectively). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Most of the specific conductance increase in the Yampa River occurs near <br />the headwaters area (fig. 8), where values change from 100 ~mhos/cm?r less to <br />between 300 and 400 ~mhos/cm in a 20-mile (32-km) reach. Further increases, <br />resulting from irrigation return flows and inflows of naturally high conduct- <br />ance water, are balanced by dilution downstream to the confluence with the <br />Little Snake River. The Little Snake River near its mouth had a specific con- <br />ductance of more than twice that of the Yampa River just upstream and caused <br />the specific conductance of the Yampa River to increase by about 40 percent. <br />In the 46-mile (74-km) reach within Dinosaur National Monument, specific con- <br />ductance increased by 50 ~mhos/cm during the August 1976 reconnaissance, even <br />though there are no major tributaries entering this reach. The dominant fac- <br />tor causing this increase is probably evaporation, as a net decrease in stream <br />discharge of 18 ft3/s (0.5 m3/s) was observed in this 46-mile (74-km) reach. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Iorns, Hembree, and Oakland (1965) estimated that the annual dissolved- <br />solids load of the Yampa River subbasin was about 1.8 times that of the <br />Little Snake River subbasin. However, the streamflow of the Yampa River is <br />nearly 2.6 times that of the Little Snake River. The dissolved-solids load <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />i.~ <br />