My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10311
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
11/1/1980
Author
Utah Div of Water Re
Title
White River Dam Project - Proposed Action Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />the Bonanza water supply will be to pump from the reservoir with a plant located <br /> <br /> <br />along the shore line into the present pipeline up Wagon Hound Canyon. <br /> <br /> <br />G. Hydro-Electric Power Generation <br /> <br />Earlier hydro-electric power investigations at White River Dam favored a <br /> <br /> <br />peaking power plant to be constructed. This possibility was explored by Protrans <br /> <br /> <br />Consultants of El Paso, Texas in a January 1978 report "Hydro-Electric Power at <br /> <br /> <br />White River Dam, A Reconnaissance Level Report". Following a power marketing study <br /> <br /> <br />by Bingham Engineers of Salt Lake City, Utah, in a June 1979 report which included <br /> <br /> <br />Long Park, and Kolob-Cedar City (Bulloch) hydro-electric projects, the study <br /> <br /> <br />recommended a "run-of-the-river" type plant be constructed at White River Dam. <br /> <br /> <br />Briefly, this change was made considering the great distance of the plant from <br /> <br /> <br />principal population and electric load centers which require additional costs <br /> <br /> <br />for wheeling the power to potential buyers. The most favorable potential purchaser <br /> <br /> <br />of the energy to be generated at White River Dam is Moon Lake Electric Cooperative <br /> <br /> <br />of Roosevelt, Utah. Its anticipated load curve shows a need for White River power <br /> <br /> <br />beginning in 1982 to bridge a two-year gap between Hunter Unit No. 2 and Moon Lake <br /> <br /> <br />Power Plant (site #3 of the Deseret Generation and Transmission scoping studies) <br /> <br /> <br />construction. <br /> <br />A hydro-plant of 8 M!v capacity will be constructed that will generate an <br /> <br /> <br />estimated 25,821,000 KWH on an average annual basis. The power plant will be <br /> <br /> <br />designed to produce power from releases of 250 cfs minimum to 600 cfs maximum <br /> <br /> <br />under a maximum head of III feet and a minimum of 66 feet. If Colorado White <br /> <br /> <br />River water resource developments do not materialize, the power plant could <br /> <br /> <br />generate 29,405,000 KWH annually. <br /> <br />H. Labor Force <br /> <br />The construction of the dam and reservoir will require approximately two <br /> <br /> <br />years. The labor force will fluctuate from 15 persons to 50. Excavation and <br /> <br /> <br />embankment operations can be accomplished with about 20 men. When concrete forming <br /> <br /> <br />and placing is in operation during approximately one-fourth of the construction <br /> <br /> <br />period the number of employees will approach 50. Construction workers will be <br /> <br /> <br />drawn largely from the local area and they will probably commute to the site. <br /> <br />- 20 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.