My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10309
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8510.100.40
Description
Rio Grande Compact Commission
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Title
Analysis of Report of Committee of Engineers to Rio Grande Compact Commissioners dated December 27 1937
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'- '';;'. '-~-',~ .... <br /> <br />~ <br />C\l <br />o::t' <br />~"'" <br /> <br />(::...: <br />C",;J <br /> <br />In general, the intent of the compact is to define and determine <br /> <br />the relati~ ri~lts of the respective states, to use and consume the <br /> <br />waters of the Rio Grn.."1de River. The intent of' the engineering <br /> <br />advisers a.ppears to be to so define the rights of Colorado, for <br /> <br />example, as toe a) parmi t of continuing present .practioes, and (b) permit <br /> <br />of such adlliti<nal Mas as may be made of supplies whioh, in the paS't. <br /> <br />may have been wasted at the lo_r end of the river basin. It appearS, <br /> <br />from an examination of the data, that reoognition ot present uses tar' <br /> <br />otrtwei&lJ.s the importanoe of the benof1ts whioh might result f'rOlll <br />f'w'ther utililllat:1oo of previously W8lted S'tree.m flows. Since the <br />definitions of present praotiaes, or tho effects thereof, in the san <br /> <br />Luis Valley, appear to have been oarefully end a.ooura-rely defined, and <br /> <br />sinee unoertainty might result frOlll a provisi on under whioh, af"ter <br />five years, the obligation of Colorado might be altered, there is a; <br />question all to the wisdom. of inoluding the suggested provl$im. <br />19. In the a.pplioation at the Rio Grande and Conejos delivery <br /> <br />sohedules, the engineering o.dvisers rec01l!!1Wnd that appropriate <br /> <br />adjuS'trnents muS't be made forI <br /> <br />(a) Any tra11s-111ounts.in div01"si0ll3J -.. which lilight <br />better be defined as water exported frOl11 or imported to <br />the basin, aooompanied by explrmations of julli; what <br />adjustMents shall be made, . <br /> <br />(b) Any change in location of gauging stationsl and <br /> <br />(0) "Any new or increased depletion of natural runoff <br />at gaging stations above Loba:tos"J - ..which <br />statement is not clear, und ~~ght readily become a <br />fruit,tu1 source of controversy. <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.