Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...... <br />c.o <br />00 <br />-,J <br /> <br />Chapter 10. DESCRIPTION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM TO <br />ESTIMATE FUTURE SALINITY DAMAGES.......................................,........,..,.. <br /> <br />79 <br /> <br />Program feat ures..... ...................................... ........ ............... ..,....,..........,.. ............ ......, .......,.. 79 <br />User instructions ................,....,........................................,................,.................'.................. 80 <br />Future modifications to program ...............................,........,..........,......................."..........., 80 <br /> <br />Note: CRSDE Program and standard CRSDE input data discs are included in <br />the Instructions for Using the Colorado River Salinity Damage Estimation Program. <br /> <br />Appendix A: BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................,.........................,........,......."..'..,.....,..,.."..........,..... 83 <br /> <br />Appendix B: LIST OF PERSONS INTER VIEWED ....................................................,........... 91 <br /> <br />FIGURES <br /> <br />1. Annual salinity damages based on lO-year average salinity and 500 mgiL base ................. 6 <br />2, Annual salinity damages based on lO-year average salinity for <br />both the 500 mgiL and 334 mgiL bases .............................................................................. 6 <br />3, Salinity projections below Hoovcr Dam (1987 CRSS) without further conlrols................. 19 <br />4, Saliruty projection below Parker Dam (1987 CRSS) without further controls '....'........'..... 19 <br />5, Salinity projection at Imperial Dam (1987 CRSS) without further controls........................ 19 <br />6, Regression curve of yield of oranges/tangerines vs TDS level.............................................., 26 <br />7, Life span of water heaters vs. salinity level. .............'.....................'.......................................... 41 <br />8. Annual salinity damages based on TDS in the river in 1986 <br />for both the 500 mgiL and 334 mgiL bases ........................................................................ 71 <br />9. Annual salinity damages based on TDS in the river in 1986 and the 500 mgIL base '..,....' 71 <br />10. Annual salinity damages based on lO-year average salinity and the 500 mgIL base......... 73 <br />11. Annual salinity damages based on lO-year average salinity for <br />botb tbe 500 mgIL and 334 mgIL bases .............................,...............,.................'........'..... 73 <br />12. Annual salinity damages per household in tbe Lower Colorado River service area ....... 73 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />1. TDS levels considered for baseline and current condition assumptions ..........................., 13 <br />2. "Current" TDS values used in the study in mgIL...............................................,................... 14 <br />3. Blends of Colorado River water and local ground or surface water ................................... 15 <br />4, Current or estimated TDS levels of M&I water supplies in the <br />Lower Colorado River Basin..............................................................,.................,............... 21 <br />5, TDS thresbold levels in applied irrigation water .........,..'............,........,................................, 23 <br />6, Reasons for drinking bottled water or for using a home filter system <br /> <br />in parts of California '..................................................................'.........."..................,.......,'.. 33 <br />7. Orange County Water Quality Cost Study answered by Metropolitan Water District '.... 36 <br />8, Findings ofTDS link to household damage ................,.................,..,..................................,.., 37 <br /> <br />v <br />