Laserfiche WebLink
<br />shiners had consumed all the razorback suckers in the three <br />sympatric treatments.. A similar study was initiated on July <br />28, 1993 using juvenile razorback sucker (mean 0.092 grjfish) <br />incorporating 300 and 150 razorback suckers. Following <br />termination of the experiment (August 26, 1993) only one <br />razorback sucker remained alive in all three cages, whereas, <br />over 50% of the red shiners in the experiment survived. <br />In an effort to define subadult habitat use of razorback <br />sucker in a flooded bottomland, five subadult razorback sucker <br />(between '178 and 254 rom) were implanted with a radio <br />transmitters and introduced into Old Charley Wash. Four fish <br />were located and habitat data collected on 14 July 1993, but <br />by late August only two fish could be found in the bottomland. <br />Aerial flights indicated at least one transmitter was located <br />near a cormorant rookery. Data collected suggested that fish <br />tended to use the deepest areas of the bottomland. However, <br />it appears that avian predation may be a significant factor <br />affecting survival of fish stocked into natural wetlands. <br />Relative to adult habitat use, seven adult razorback suckers <br />were implanted with radio transmitters (five from razorback <br />bar, one from Echo Park and one from Island Park) and returned <br />to the Green River. Immediately after implantation, all fish <br />traveled downstream for approximately two to three weeks. <br />None of the fish implanted used flooded bottomlands during the <br />spring high water period. However, it is unknown if the <br />stress due to implantation altered behavior during this <br />period. Fish tended to use run and eddy habitats that were <br />fairly deep (usually ~ 2 m). Most fish did not travel long <br />distances. Fish implanted at razorback bar tended to move <br />upstream, while the two fish implanted above split Mountain <br />Canyon tended to move downstream. Of interest was that no <br />adults traveled lower than RMI 270. This pattern may suggest <br />that fish captured in spawning condition at the mouth of the <br />Duchesne River represent a locally spawning population. The <br />current database indicates that fish captured in the Duchesne <br />River area have also' been collected at the Escalanate <br />razorback bar area. This information, together with the <br />tagging data collected during the last two years may suggest <br />a single spawning population in the middle Green River. <br /> <br />X. status of data submission (where applicable): <br /> <br />All appropriate data will be submitted to the database <br />manager. <br /> <br />XI. FY 93 Budget: <br />A. Funds Provided: $37,000 <br />B. Funds Expended: $37.,000 <br /> <br />XII. Recommendations: <br /> <br />Telemetry data indicates the possibility that another spawning <br /> <br />3 <br />