My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10284
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:07 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1998
Author
USGS
Title
Water-Quality Assessment of the Arkansas River Basin - Southeastern Colorado - 1990-93
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Runoff from thunderstorms can have a large <br />effect on suspended-sediment concentrations in the <br />lower basin. Two sampled storm events at Catlin Dam <br />illustrate the potential for transport of large sediment <br />loads from tributary drainages to the lower Arkansas <br />River. In July 1991, a fast-moving thunderstorm that <br />was localized in the Apishapa River drainage <br />produced suspended-sediment concentrations in <br />excess of 20,000 mg/L in the Apishapa River (pI. I). <br />Downstream at Catlin Dam, a sharp increase in <br />streamflow and suspended sediment was observed as <br />flow from the Apishapa River reached the site. A <br />comparison of suspended-sediment concentrations and <br />loads at Catlin Dam during the storm runoff and <br />during a similar streamflow in June 1991 (peak flow) <br />showed large differences; concentrations and loads <br />were nearly five times larger from storm runoff than <br />those observed during the peak flow in June (table 28). <br />In August 1992, concentrations of suspended sediment <br />at Catlin Dam following a storm event were about <br />13 times greater than concentrations measured at a <br />similar flow one month earlier (table 28). <br /> <br />Bacteria <br /> <br />Water samples were collected and analyzed for <br />fecal-coliform bacteria, total-coliform bacteria, and <br />fecal-streptococcal bacteria at selected sites in the <br />Arkansas River Basin. Twenty-one to 24 samples were <br />collected for fecal-coliform and fecal-streptococcal <br />bacteria at 15 main-stem sites and I tributary site <br />throughout the basin. Sixteen to 22 samples were <br /> <br />collected for total-coliform bacteria at 8 main-stem <br />sites in the upper basin only. Coliform organisms, <br />while relatively harmless themselves, are usually <br />present in water that contains enteric pathogens and, <br />thus, can serve as an indicator. Fecal-coliform analysis <br />is a more definitive test for recent fecal contamination, <br />and fecal coliform is the standard organism used for <br />testing sewage, untreated public water supplies, and <br />primary contact waters. Fecal streptococci are used as <br />indicators of contamination of water because the <br />normal habitat of these organisms is the intestines of <br />man and animals. Fecal-streptococci data verify fecal <br />pollution and may provide additional information <br />concerning the probable origin of the pollution <br />(Britton and Greeson, 1987). <br />Concentrations of fecal coliform in the <br />Arkansas River generally increased downstream <br />(fig. 31) and were relatively low in comparison to <br />stream water-quality standards. Median concentrations <br />offecal coliform were less than the biological standard <br />for all sampled main-stem sites. Typically, the stan- <br />dard is 2,000 colonies/l 00 mL but can be as low as <br />200 colonies/! 00 mL (Colorado Department of <br />Health, 1994). The highest median concentration <br />occurred at Las Animas (162 colonies/! 00 mL). <br />Median fecal-coliform concentrations tended to be <br />highest during snowmelt runoff and post-snowmelt <br />runoff (fig. 31). Median fecal-coliform concentrations <br />were larger in the lower basin, particularly during the <br />post-snowmelt runotT flow regime. In general, fecal- <br />streptococci concentrations also increased down- <br />stream. Median concentrations ranged from 9.5 colo- <br />nies/!OO mL at Leadville to 612 colonies/I 00 mL at <br /> <br />Table 28, Comparison of streamflow and suspended-sediment concentrations and loads lor <br />storms and other streamflow regimes at Catlin Dam <br /> Streamflow Streamflow, Concentration, Instantaneous <br />Date characterization In cubic leet In milligrams load, <br /> per second per liter In tons per day <br /> July 2, 1991 <br />June II. 1991 Snowmelt runoff 1,850 959 4,790 <br />July 2, 1991 Stann 1,750 4,770 22,500 <br /> Percent difference -5 397 370 <br /> August 18. 1991 <br />July 17, 1992 Post-snowmelt runoff 581 724 1,140 <br />August 18, 1992 Stann 613 9,469 15,700 <br /> Percent difference 5.5 1,208 1,277 <br /> <br />64 Water-Quality Assessment 01 the Arkansas River Basin, Southeastern Colorado, 199G-e3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.