My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10284
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:07 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1998
Author
USGS
Title
Water-Quality Assessment of the Arkansas River Basin - Southeastern Colorado - 1990-93
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Below John Martin Reservoir and Coolidge, Kans., <br />sites probably due to the prevalence of irrigation <br />return flows in the reach. <br />Temporal variability in nitrate concentrations <br />was apparent, particularly in the lower Arkansas River <br />Basin. Median concentrations were higher during low- <br />flow (October-April) than during either the snowmelt- <br />runoff (May-June) or post-snowmelt runoff (July- <br />September) regime (fig. 26). Low-flow conditions <br />resulted in less dilution in the river, possibly resulting <br />in higber concentrations during this regime. Concen- <br />trations during snowmelt-runoff and post-snowmelt <br />runoff regimes were similar throughout the lower <br />basin. A Speannan's rank correlation test was used to <br />detennine whether nitrate concentrations changed <br />with streamflow. This nonparametric test uses the <br />ranks of the data to determine the strength of the asso- <br />ciation of the variables. Speannan correlation coeffi- <br />cients, or r values, range from -I to + I, and data are <br />highly correlated as these bounds are approached. <br />When r = 0, there is no correlation. The Spearman's <br />rank test indicated there was an inverse relation <br />between streamflow and nitrate concentrations in the <br />lower basin. Main-stem sites from Pueblo to La Junta <br />had r values ranging from --{).68 to --{).89. The nega- <br />tive sign indicates an inverse relation; that is. nitrate <br />concentrations decreased as streamflow increased. All <br />probabilities were significant at the u=0.05 level. <br />Nitrate concentrations in the Arkansas River <br />were low in comparison to stream-water-quality <br />standards and drinking-water standards. The stream- <br />water-quality standard for nitrate is 10 mg/L and was <br />not exceeded in any sample. Although nitrate concen- <br />trations generally increased downstream throughout <br />the basin, concentrations did not exceed stream-water- <br />quality standards at any site. <br /> <br />Phosphorus <br /> <br />Phosphorus concentrations generally were <br />lower in the upper basin than in the lower basin <br />(fig. 28). Median concentrations in the upper Arkansas <br />River ranged from less than 0.01 mg/L at Nathrop to <br />0.05 mgIL at Portland. Concentrations in the lower <br />basin ranged from 0.02 mgIL at Pueblo to 0.28 mg/L <br />at Avondale. Concentrations increased significantly <br />(u=0.05) between the Pueblo and Highway 227 sites, <br />probably due to inflow from Fountain Creek' the <br />median phosphorus concentration at the Fou~tain <br />Creek site was 0.96 mg/L. Median concentrations <br /> <br />more than doubled in the river downstream to Avon- <br />dale. Median phosphorus concentrations at Highway. <br />227, Avondale, and Catlin Dam exceeded the EPA' <br />recommendation of 0.1 mg/L for total phosphorus in <br />rivers (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <br />1986a). The median concentration at Las Animas <br />(0.10 mg/L) exceeded the threshold value of 0.05 <br />mg/L as recommended by the Environmental Protec- <br />tion Agency for total phosphorus in a river entering a <br />reservoir (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <br />1986a). There was no distinct temporal pattern in the <br />phosphorus concentrations. <br /> <br />Radiochemical Constituents <br /> <br />Water-quality samples for radiochemical anal- <br />yses were collected periodically from 1990 through <br />1992 at eight surface-water sites on the main stem of <br />tbe Arkansas River. The samples were analyzed for <br />natural uranium, gross alpha (expressed as natural <br />uranium), and gross beta (expressed as cesium-137 <br />and strontium-90/yttrium-90). Forty-nine samples <br />were analyzed for dissolved uranium, 4 to 8 samples at <br />each site, and 46 samples were analyzed for gross <br />alpha and gross beta, 5 to 7 samples at each site. <br />Relatively high levels of natural uranium occur <br />in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States <br />(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986b), and <br />parts of southeastern Colorado have been identified as <br />having consistently high concentrations of dissolved <br />uranium in surface and ground water (Shannon, 1979). <br />Several possible contributing factors for the high <br />concentrations of dissolved uranium include composi- <br />tion bedrock, land use, and concentration of dissolved <br />constituents due to evapotranspiration. Large parts of <br />southeastern Colorado are underlain by marine shale <br />(Pierre Shale) and limestone of Late Cretaceous age <br />(Zielinski and others, 1995). Some sedimentary rocks, <br />especially marine shales, have been shown to have <br />greater than nonnal radioactivity due to uranium, <br />thorium, and potassium (Pettijohn, 1949). Agriculture <br />is the predominant land use along the lower Arkansas <br />River; water initially diverted from the river is used <br />for irrigation, then the return flows are used again for <br />irrigation, and eventually the water returns to the river. <br />This reuse of water increases the amount of time the <br />soil and rock can interact with the water, resulting in <br />further dissolution of minerals and increased ion- <br />exchange interaction, which is indicated by the <br /> <br />56 W.t.r.Quallty Assessment 01 the Ark.nsas River B..ln, Southe..tern Color.do, 1991l-93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.