My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10284
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:07 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1998
Author
USGS
Title
Water-Quality Assessment of the Arkansas River Basin - Southeastern Colorado - 1990-93
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/' --- <br />,;f"~' - . - . . - . <br />--.--- .-..-:';' <br />'::"".::-...:-=--=:::-..:.-=-~:..- - - - - - - -- <br />, <br />lP <br />~",p <br /> <br />0233 <br /> <br />Chromium <br /> <br />About 90 percent or more of the samples <br />collected at the four sites from Pueblo Reservoir to <br />Avondale had dissolved-chromium concentrations that <br />were less than the reponing limit of I j.1g/L. Total- <br />recoverable chromium concentrations typically were <br />less than or equal to the reponing limit (I j.1g/L) at the <br />main-stem sites, Below Pueblo Reservoir and Pueblo <br />(fig. 17). Between Pueblo and Highway 227, the <br />median total-recoverable chromium concentration <br />increased to 1.4 j.1g/L and 2.0 j.1g/L during the post- <br />snowmelt runoff and low-flow regimes, respectively <br />(fig. 17). Inflow of chromium from Fountain Creek <br />presumably caused this increase; the median total- <br />recoverable chromium concentration in Fountain <br />Creek at Pueblo was 6 j.1g/L (Dash and Ortiz, (996). <br />The median total-recoverable chromium concentration <br />generally increased between Highway 227 and Avon- <br />dale (fig. 17); the resuspension of chromium with <br />fluvial sediment and unsampled tributary inflow <br />between Highway 227 and Avondale are possible <br />causes of the increased concentrations. <br />Dissolved and total-recoverable chromium <br />concentrations were analyzed in six samples collected <br /> <br />Z 4.5 <br />o <br />;:: <br />r:; 4.0 l- <br />I- <br />Z <br />W <br />u <br />8a: 3.51- <br /> <br />~~ <br />::E~ 3.0f- <br />Ow <br />a:a. <br />:I:", <br />u" <br />~[2 2.5f- <br />"'<!l <br />"'0 <br />a: a: <br />~(J 2.0:'" <br />8~ <br />wZ <br />~- 1.5- <br />g <br />I- <br />~ 1.0- <br />i5 <br />w <br />" 0.5 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~o~ <br />'1-'4' <br />,po <br />",.~ <br />~ <br /> <br />at three main-stem sites from Catlin Dam downstream <br />to Below John Manin Reservoir. Seventeen of these <br />18 samples had dissolved-chromium concentrations <br />that were less than the reponing limit (\ j.1g/L). <br />Conversely, total-recoverable chromium concentra- <br />tions at Catlin Dam and at Las Animas typically were <br />greater than the reporting limit and ranged from 2 to <br />170 j.1g/L. It was not possible to distinguish temporal <br />patterns in total-recoverable chromium concentrations <br />at these three sites because of the small number of <br />samples that were collected. The median total- <br />recoverable concentrations at Catlin Dam and at <br />Las Animas were 16.5 and 11.5 j.1g/L, respectively. <br />Between Las Animas and Below John Martin Reser- <br />voir, the median total-recoverable chromium concen- <br />tration decreased to 0.85 j.1g/L, presumably due to <br />deposition in the reservoir. The resuspension of chro- <br />mium with fluvial sediment and unsampled tributary <br />inflow are possible causes of increased total-recover- <br />able chromium concentrations at Catlin Dam and at <br />Las Animas. No samples collected at any site in the <br />lower basin had dissolved-chromium concentrations <br />that exceeded water-quality standards. <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />/' - - ;'- - - - - - --- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />/' <br /> <br />/' <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />-- <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ <br />,."' <br />-?-4' <br /> <br />"'~. <br />...",0 <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br /> <br />- - SNOWMELT RUNOFF POST-SNOWMELT RUNOFF - . - LOW FLOW <br />(May-June) (July-September} (October-April) <br /> <br />Figure 17. Median total-recoverable chromium concentrations by streamflow regime in the lower Arkansas River, <br />Apnl199o-March 1993. <br /> <br />WATER QUALITY 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.