Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 7. Results of Wilcoxon rank-sum test (f-tailed) of pre-treatment (April 199O-March 1992) and post-treatment <br />(April 1992-March 1993) instantaneous streamflow and copper concentrations at selected sites in the upper Arkansas River <br />Basin <br /> <br />[fi3/s. cubic feel per second; j,tg/L. micrograms per liter; <, less than;:5, less than or equal to; n, lest not perfonned; NA, not applicable] <br /> <br /> Streamflow Dissolved copper Total-recoverable <br /> copper <br />Site name Pre-/post- Pre-/post- Pre-/post- <br />(see table 1) treatment p-value treatment p-value treatment p-value <br /> median 1 median 1 median 1 <br /> (ft3IS) ("glL) ("g/L) <br />Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel 2.3/2.4 0.38 __l NA __l. NA <br />California Gulch \.8/1.8 .50 1017.5 .11 130129. .03 <br />Leadville 32/58 .32 III .49 2/2 .25 <br />Mall. 95/134 .26 . ill> <.01 " ..613' <.01 <br />Granite 228/392 .18 2/2 .26 5/3 .11 <br />Buena Vista 253/456 .22 2/2 .47 . ....... 4/2." .02 <br />Nalhrop 4331701 .2\ 2/1.5 .23 4i2. .02 <br />Wellsville 460/690 .12 2/2 .32 4/2 .07 <br />Parkdale 476/788 .\0 1/1.5 .11 4/1.5 .10 <br />Portland 470/694 .08 III .48 4/3.5 .28 <br />1 Significant differences (p:SO.05) are shaded. <br />2TesI could not be perfonned because more lhan 50 percent of the dala were less than the reponing limit. <br /> <br />The incidence of dissolved-copper concentra- <br />tions that exceeded stream-water-quality standards <br />was small (tahle 8). No samples exceeded the acute <br />copper standard, whereas only one sample collected <br />at Nathrop in May exceeded the chronic copper <br />standard. It is possible that more exceedances of the <br /> <br />copper standards occulTed during the snowmelt- <br />runoff regime, but this determination cannot be <br />made because most of these samples were not <br />included in the analyses due to quality-assurance <br />concerns associated with the use of the D74 <br />sampler. <br /> <br />Table 8. Number of samples that exceeded acute and chronic copper water-quality standards <br />in the upper Arkansas River, April 199o-March 1993 <br /> <br />Site name Number of samples Number of samples that exceeded standard I <br />(see table 1) analyzed Acute Chronic <br />standard" standard3 <br />Leadville 24 0 0 <br />Malta 25 0 0 <br />Granite 22 0 0 <br />Buena Vista 22 0 0 <br />Nathrop 21 0 I <br />Wellsville 22 0 0 <br />Parkdale 21 0 0 <br />Ponland 21 0 0 <br /> <br />1 Acute and chronic copper standards are based on disso]ved-<:opper concentration <br />(Colorado Depanment of Health, 1994). <br />2Acute standard. in microgramo:; per liter = efO 9422[ln(hardnml]-I.4634). <br />3Chronic standard. in micrograms per liter = e(O 8~45[ln(hardnc:s5)].1.46S). <br /> <br />22 Water-Quality Assessment of the Arkansas River Basin, Southeastern Colorado. 199~3 <br />