Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.'. <br />" <br /> <br />MR. 1l0dVIJ:::r.,: If ~TOU llidn't consider the stEte line, you <br /> <br />WOUld treat them bot!: elite? <br /> <br />MR. :lUMP: In the development, I FOllld arrange that the water <br /> <br /> <br />up above could be used first, u,d thGn be bro'1(:ht down and used <br /> <br />again on the lower ground. <br />MR. HORVI~L: Your experience is th~,t the p~ojects are clways <br /> <br />developed best from the upper end of the stronD? <br /> <br />MR. HUMP: It hr,s been the gener2.1 pI'actic'J that the ecsiest <br />land h2s been 'c1eveloped first wi th the least cost, :cns as vie <br /> <br />be~LJ to' run out of th(?t kind of IE-.nd, we go back further into <br /> <br />the hills, the same as our proposition. ~'be lovier landS were <br /> <br />deveJ,ou8d first with the leE.st expenso; but we are running out <br /> <br />of thot kind of land. <br /> <br />1,IH. N0rtVIl!:L: If ~'ou bad an tcbsolutely ncw project with low <br /> <br />lands End high lendS Ln'~, were going to develo'lJ the whole thing, <br /> <br />would you begin :.:t the top or lower down ,~\t tho cheaper l~nds <br /> <br />first? <br /> <br />IvlH. Rmll': I would stl',I't with the lower lr.nC\s first, :but the <br />faot that tho lowor h,nS,s r,erc ne\"'Jlope it wOlll'l not hurt the dc- <br />velopmont of those high,;r up. 1'hey would hf>ve to be:3crved first <br /> <br />and I would go on a!ld m~,]ce the best economic2.1 use of this water. <br /> <br />MR. NORVI.b:L: IOU hC\Te !l certain priority out of the river? <br /> <br />lJR. RUMi': Yes sir. <br /> <br />'G.J, <br />