My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10241
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:14:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/29/1922
Author
Colorado River Com.
Title
Hearing of the Colorado River Commission Convened at Grand Junction
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />I~ <br />I <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR. IWRVThL: Do they neve, flu fa, aS8yol1 know, the sa,lle feel- <br />ing res~cting the ai;:? l~ow th8re is r;;ora in that tbought than <br />frivolity, beC8use writers on irrigation have almost unanimously <br /> <br />referred to v,ater and air on the same basis; that'they were prac- <br />tic.. lly the same and tha tone be lcnge 0. to the atE. te as much as <br />thB other; do you think that that is the proper attitude to assume, <br />that because the air or water origin'ites in this state, if it does <br /> <br />that, thet it ought to belong to the p~o:ple, WDen the natural in- <br /> <br />clination of the earth is so fixed that both of them slide to sane <br /> <br />other 10celi1ty? <br /> <br />MR. HA"PtR: That is a question I ask ?3rmission of the com- <br /> <br />mission not to answer. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIL!: I see where you are right. If there is a surplus <br />of water in Colol'!:!do, would it not be the proper thing to make <br />con tract wi th the othe r sta tes to gi ve them sane assuranc e of an <br />amount that they may be ~ntitlBi to the use of? <br /> <br />MR. HA?PLR: Yes, I think so, <br /> <br />Mil. IWRVI,bL: I ~otice:i in the DD.!:€r this morning, the state- <br /> <br />ment was mao.e that the probaJ:.ility of using more than 30 or 33 <br />per cent, or one-third of the water of the Golorado rtiver in this <br /> <br />state was impossible; do ~'ou think that is proper? <br /> <br />Mn. HAnrll'R: I think tbl.'t from the sho"ling Hr. l.lerriell made <br /> <br />here, that is substantially correct, <br /> <br />G.J. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.