Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,e, <br /> <br />1t <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />If~. HArl:?l::R: In my opinion it shoulcl. <br />Mit. NORVUL: j,long th.., 80n:e lines of tile principlei3 thet <br />the rteclaffiation Service goes on: in :':act all reclsITlation with <br />which you have been connecteQ; <br />a man has to spend <br />give longer growing Season or <br />MR. l:iA,,:i?1n: It is y>robabl,e the t in the lower lands this <br />develo~ment QSY t~ke plece first. <br />M.:'\.lW.:'\VItL: Isn't it to the 2dvantage, in your o:)inion, of <br />the uClper 12nds, to have Sonle de:':init'J restriction laid out in <br />order thot water may be left in those upper .12rlds that will be <br />develo,Jed later? <br />MR. EAR?~R: thae is another question on ~hich I cun only <br />ex:oress ~y person21 oryinion 2na of course I may not s!!f-ree, with <br />the Colorado view. <br /> <br />MR. I!O"VH;1: This r.lellns consumptive use; this refers to re- <br />striction of consumptive use? <br />M."\. HLHEW: It seems to !.Ie thc.t thct resolves itself into <br />thG question of whether in ony futc:re period the doctrine of <br />priority of use is going to guvern regardless of state lines. <br />It would seem if ttat doctrine is ['0ing to be put into use at <br />some futurG ;?eriod, the upper sta tes would be better off to <br />acce)t a re~30nsble 21loc~tion at the present time. <br /> <br />G.J. <br />