My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10231
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10231
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:13:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/19/1980
Author
Gregory Hobbs
Title
Colorado Water Quality Law - Protection for Maximum Beneficial Use of Water Rights
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />GO <br />r0 <br />-J <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />& Milling Company, 9 Colo. App. 407, 418 (1897) (mine and <br />mill wastes). <br />Thus, the Colorado common law recognizes a right <br />of action for damages and injunction by water ,users against <br />each other to enforce that degree of water purity requisite <br />to their beneficial uses. The priority doctrine has no ap- <br />plication to these circumstances -- the question is not who <br />was first but whether a water use is impaired by pollution <br />caused by another. As a corOllary to this principle, a water <br />rights holder does not acquire the right to receive and <br />utilize pollutant constituents being carried by the stream, <br />even though a particular constituent in the water many en- <br />hance the productivity or economic benefit of the waters' <br />application. A-B Cattle Company v. United States, ____ Colo. <br />____, 589 P.2d 57 (1979). <br />In Colorado, by statute, the preservation of <br />aquatic life is recognized as a beneficial use, in that <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board may appropriate, <br />within the priority system, quantities of water "to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree." C.R.S. 1973, <br />37-92-102(3): Colorado River Water Conservation District v. <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colo. , 594 P.2d <br />570 (1979). As a water rights holder, the Water Conservation <br />Board has common law rights of action to protect the purpose <br />of its appropriation against a subsequent junior as to quantity <br />and against any person who, generates a'1d causes the introducction <br />of waste prOducts that may impair the Board's aquatic life use. <br />The Colorado common law of water quality protection <br />for beneficial use does not recognize a right in water users <br />to curtail or prevent water withdrawal which may have a con- <br />centrating effect upon naturally occurring or man caused <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.