My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10226
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10226
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:52 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:13:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.03
Description
San Juan River - Recovery Implementation Program - General Info
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/22/2001
Title
Final Environmental Assessment on Proposed Short-Term Low FlowTest Releases from Navajo Reservoir into the San Juan River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />o <br />Q <br />v.~ <br />10'. <br />m <br /> <br />34. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />35. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />36. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />31. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />Historicflows and impacts at Bluffwill be described in the EIS, <br /> <br />The EA should acknowledge that the National Park Service likely has <br />Federal Reserved Water rights (as yet unquantified) along the San Juan <br />River with the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and one of the <br />purposes of the low flow test will be to determine if 250 cfs flows would <br />violate those rights, <br />Reclamation is conferring with National Park Service water right experts <br />to determine if there is a right and if long-term operations of Navajo <br />Reservoir could be affected by the right, This issue will be addressed in <br />the operations EIS, <br /> <br />From a river rafting point of view around Bluff, even 500 cfs is too low; <br />Bluff flows need to be around 1,000 cfs, A recreational threshold value for <br />flows at Bluff should be established, <br />Designating a recreational threshold flow for recreation on a river is not <br />afunction of the Bureau of Reclamation. Minimum rafting flows vary with <br />type of equipment, experience of the recreationist, type of trip and other <br />factors. Minimumflow needs varying between 500 and 1,000 cfs have <br />been mentioned at public meetings, <br /> <br />It seems essential that the low flow test include an evaluation of the effects <br />on recreational boating downstream from Bluff, especially at the Clay <br />Hills Crossing take-out in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. <br />There is a siltation problem in the Clay Hills area. Clay Hills actually is <br />within the high water area of Lake Powell, When the lake drops, silt <br />deposits inteifere with boating and this is a more difficult problem at low <br />flows, An evaluation of this problem is beyond the scope of the EA; <br />however if impacts occur at the site, they will be recorded in the low flow <br />test report. <br /> <br />Trout Fishery <br /> <br />Rapidly decreasing stream flows can lead to stranding of fish as declining <br />water levels leave previously-occupied habitats without water, The draft <br />EA does not address whether the proposed ramp-down of 250 cfs over <br />four hours is adequate to allow fish to adjust to the changing stream <br />channel. The EA also does not identify the rate of the ramp (increment per <br />hour), <br />The ramp rate is 200 cfs per 2 hours, The proposed ramping rate <br />identified in the draft EA was formulated with the New Mexico <br />Department of Game and Fish's input, This is the same ramping rate used <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.