My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10225
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:13:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8283.100
Description
Colorado River Computer Models - Colorado River Simulation System
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1985
Author
John Burke
Title
CRSS Vs CRSP - Analysis of Data and Results from Two CAP Water Supply Studies - January 1981-CRSP and December 1984-CRSS
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. I <br /> <br />UUI/U0 <br /> <br />The first Central Arizona Project (CAP) water supply projections produced <br />by the Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) (December 1984) portray a <br />significantly different future for the project than did previous studies. <br />This has affected cost allocation and repayment analyses, and raised <br />questions as to what caused the changed projection. <br /> <br />The large increases in projected future water supply for CAP are the net <br />result of the many differences in data base, methods of simulation, and <br />modeling assumptions that exist between the CRSS and the Colorado River <br />Storage Project (CRSP) computer models. <br /> <br />The most significant of the differences may be explained by one of the <br />following generalizations: <br /> <br />1. More water is entering the river/reservoir system in CRSS than did in <br />CRSP. <br /> <br />2. Mechanisms in CRSS are enabling much of that water to be delivered to <br />CAP. <br /> <br />Before elaborating on these differences, it should be noted that comparison <br />of CRSS and CRSP results reveals that CAP water supply is the only major <br />study parameter that differs so significantly. Relative differences in <br />other study parameters are much smaller. This is so because CAP's right to <br />Colorado River water is subordinate to most of the rest of the Lower Basin <br />water users. Any incremental change in the Lower Basin's water supply is <br />likely to have an eventual impact on delivery to CAP. <br /> <br />CAP is first to feel the impact of any water shortage or water surplus <br />situation encountered in the simulation of Colorado River operations. Thus <br />any shortage averted or any surplus situation created will go toward <br />increasing the project's average yield. <br /> <br />Based on the two studies used for comparison here, it appears that on the <br />average, CAP eventually diverts a little more than half of the additional <br />water available to the Lower Basin in the CRSS study. The remainder of the <br />additional water may flow to Mexico (as the system spills), may be diverted <br />by The Metropolitan Water District (MWD), or may remain in storage. <br /> <br />Explanation of the Sources of CAP's Additional <br />Water Supply in CRSS vs. CRSP <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, the reasons explaining CAP's additional water <br />supply fall into two general categories. The following expands those <br />general headings to a list of specific significant factors which combine to <br />increase CAP's water supply in CRSS. <br /> <br />1. More water is entering the river/reservoir system in CRSS than did in <br />CRSP. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.