Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Il02\Qb8 <br /> <br />ulants as I ime, I imestone, magnesia, or sodium (Yan, 1976). Occasionally, <br />salable sulfur byproducts may be recovered, and the residuals after treat- <br />ment from the flue gas-scrubbing systems must be disposed of along with <br />the soiid ash material (about 141 tonnes per megawatt generating capacity <br />per year). In imposing residuals-modification requirements on sulfur gas- <br />es, resultant sol id residuals are increased by 10 to 12 times (I. C. James <br />and others, written commun., 1976), and resultant environmental impacts <br />merely are transformed to another environmental medium (Reiquam and oth- <br />ers, 1975). Ash and dewatered sol ids from a "hot-side" precipitator <br />scrubbing flue-stack gases at the Hayden power plant (fig. 1) are trucked <br />and dumped into excavated pits in a nearby mine that suppl ies coal to the <br />plant. Possible ground-water contamination 'resulting from the disposal of <br />these sol id wastes warrants further monitoring and study. Waste-heat dis- <br />sipation through cool ing towers generally requires soma treatment of the <br />mineral ized cool ing waters. Biocides to control biological growth and oth- <br />er chemical agents to control scal ing in cool ing towers must be disposed <br />of. Various trace metals in coal combustion are transformed into solid <br />and gaseous residuals (Klein and others, 1975). For example, prel iminary <br />data from a streamflow-quality reconnaissance survey (Steele and others, <br />1976a) give evidence of anomalously high concentrations of copper in the <br />bottom sediments of a small tributary stream to the Yampa River receiving <br />intermittent discharge effluents from the Hayden power plant. Thermally <br />polluted plant discharges are not permitted under current effluent stand- <br />ards; however, the possibil ity of controlled liquid-residual discharges <br />still exists. The resulting effects of thermal discharges on stream sys- <br />tems may be evaluated with the aid of stream-temperature model ing tech- <br />ni ques (Stee Ie, James, Bauer, and others, 1976b). <br /> <br />Consumptive-water-use estimates for electric-power generation include <br />water used for boiler feed, cooling, flue-gas scrubbing, and ash disposal. <br />Water-inflow rates for a power-generation plant producing 1,200 megawatts <br />with no flue-gas scrubbing is estimated to range between 0.53 and 1.17 <br />billion cubic metres per year for condensor and boiler-feed water require- <br />ments, depending upon' the particular cool ing system used. A flue-gas <br />scrubber and particulate-precipitation system increases plant water-inflow <br />rates by approximately 6 percent (I. C. James and others, written commun., <br />1976). The major consumptive use of water in a power-generation plant is <br />for evaporative cool ing of condenser water. Annual consumptive use is <br />about 0.24 mill ion cubic metres for the other three systems (Freudenthal <br />and others, 1974). These losses, compared with plant inflow of water, <br />represent2 percent or less of ,the water withdrawals, so that most of the <br />water can be recycled in the plant or reused elsewhere in the basin. If <br />once-through cool ing were used without use of some kind of impoundment- <br />recycl ing system, water-inflow rates cited above for a single l,200-mega- <br />watt plant could represent as much as 60 percent of the mean annual flow <br />from the entire Yampa River basin (1.9 bill ion cubic metres). . <br /> <br />Coal Gasification <br /> <br />For demonstrating potential impacts of coal-gasification in the Yampa <br />River basin, the residuals-management consequences of a SYNTHANE process <br />plant are being used. Impacts of other proposed coal-gasification process- <br /> <br />8 <br />