My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10175
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:11:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.200
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Mailing Lists and Correspondence
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1975
Author
various
Title
Fourteen Statements History of Fryingpan-Arkansas Project and Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />0740 <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />water that Colorado didn't use went down the Celorado River <br /> <br />and California got the benefit of it. Of course, the more <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'water we used, the less they got ana so they opposea it very <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />vigorously. And there was a man named John P. Saylor from <br /> <br />Pennsylvania, who was on the House Interior C~mnitt.e, who <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />seemed to make the Fryingpan the object of personal attacks <br /> <br />throughout <br /> <br />opposed it with every step of tho road and so <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />it kind of became more or less 0 laughing stock, whenever <br /> <br />you mentioned Saylor, you mentioned an opponent of the Frying- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />pan, Really, Mr. Saylor is 0 very fine gentleman end every <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />good friend of mine; <br /> <br />I think he relented 0 little to~ord5 <br /> <br />the end, never voted for the Fryingpon Project, but at lec~t <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />he didn't oppose it os vigorously os he hod from the beginning. <br /> <br />But he took great delight in n0801ing the witnesses who would <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />come bock on the Fryingpan Project. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />California hod a man in Conyress named Mr. Hosmer and in one <br /> <br />of hiS speeChes on the floor he commented on the fact "Colorado <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />is here, they wont to toke water so they cen raise bananas on <br /> <br />the top of PiKes Peak." Such ridiculous things os that, but <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />which I think really reacted and boomeranged against him and <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I think we got votes os 0 result of that. aut it wasn't on <br /> <br />easy job to get the Fryingpan Project authorized. I might <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />mention that when they authorized the project in 1962, we did <br />not do it by roll call vote in the House. Tnera were many <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />members who come to me~ personal friends of mine, who said, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"We wont to help you with this project, but we're getting <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.