Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> , <br /> .~' <br /> '.' :' <br /> "'<'<. <br /> ANNUAL SHORTAGES <br />C.o , <br />;~.' Shortages Shortages <br />t"tj'i In 1000 In Percent <br />C'J In 1000 In PerC6IJt <br />1.....:. Year A~re-F6et Of Ideal Sup. Year Acre-Feet Of Ideal Sup. <br />C.:> 1903 38.9 l5.7 1934 115.9 46.7 <br /> 1904 11l1..9 46.3 1936 2J.4 9.4 <br /> 1910 19.4 7.8 1939 57.2 23.1 <br /> 1913 58.2 23.5 1940 81.6 32.9 <br /> 1924 1.3 0.5 1941 3.8 10'5 <br /> 1925 11.8 4.8 1943 37.2 15.0 ",-. <br /> 1928 12.0 4.8 1944 5.8 2.3 <br /> 1931 82.8 33.4 Average ~ b;Ti <br /> <br />The above shortarAS for the years 1903 and 1904 will be the same for <br />any reservoir operation study, as the project was on river-run in accordance <br />with Rio Grande Compact obligations. <br /> <br />By increasing the storage capacity from 60,000 acre-feet to. 100,000 <br />acre-feet the reduction in the shortage of the mean annual water supply <br />would be 3.8 percent or 9,400 acre-feet annually. The mean annual supply <br />that can be provided by reservoirs of various capacities is presented on <br />Plate C. <br /> <br />Required Irrigation Capacity <br /> <br />The selection of the 60,000 acre-foot Plat ora Reservoir as the optimum <br />irrigation storage capacity required for present conditions was based upun <br />a combination of economic and water supply 8tudies. flate D was developed <br />to show the gross value of crops, 1939-1744 price base, raisAd in the proj- <br />ect under various conditions and with varying a80unts of thA ideal water <br />supply. The upper curve represents the maximum gross crop incCille VQth vari- <br />ous shortages assuming maxL~'1IT, faro effiCiency. It could only be obtained <br />if the entire area were farmed as a unit. J:nder an expert ~gricultural advianx~ <br />The middle curve represent.s the anticipated average gross crop value, 1939- <br />1944 price base. from the project with average farm effiCiency. It was usec <br />in the 0eterminations to select the recommended capacity. The lower curve <br />shows the gross crop value, 1939-l944 prices, ba~ed upon present crops with <br />maximum f~rm efficiency. <br /> <br />All three "s" curves were defined hy computed points which show the <br />crop values for various shortages in water supply. In computing the points <br />the knovm wat.er supply, as shm'm from monU.ly operation stUdies, Was distrj_- <br />buted to the ';rops 2.S the f.'lrmers would do in actual practice and the crop <br />value determined from the reduced crop yield and restricted distribution of <br />crops res.dting from the inadequate suppl:r. The middle curve W.lS used to <br />compete the g:-ocs crop value to be expected for the period of operation <br />studies for reservoirs of various capacities. i'he estimated gross crop <br />values were reduced by present gross crop values to procure the increa3e in <br />crop value assi~lable to the cifferent reser\"oir capacities. <br /> <br />'.' <br /> <br />Curves were developed, Plate E, which de[ict the best capacity for the <br />project, or, more accurately, the best capacity for the irrigators. The <br /> <br />26 <br />