Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0913 <br /> <br />Arr:! flood control reservoir, to be ef'tective, must. necessar1q'change <br />~the regimen of the stream cn which it is constructed. The tempcrary,retei1tion <br />of flood,waters necessartq reduces the peak flaws which would otherwise <br />oogur. It is possible that this inherel;lt effect, while mitigating flood. <br />damages, maybe adverse to the diversion opportunities of the more junior <br />apprGlpriators of strelllll flow downstream from the project. The lower the <br />rate at which water impounded in the flGlod cont,rolportion of a reservoir <br />is released, the greater this adverse effect m~ be on water users with <br />junior priorities. ' <br /> <br />It has been dellirable in connection with other flood control reservoirs <br />in Colorado that the outlet works be so designed that the rate of, discharge <br />from t1'le flood control pool should be ms,intained as nearq as possible at <br />the ma:xim1lm channel capaCity above which !'lood damages cOllDllence in the <br />area to be protected belaw the reservoir. In the case of the propose<i <br />Trinidad Reservoir Project, it would thus appear, in vi_ of the concern <br />which Will un<ioubtedly be expressed by present water users belaw the project, <br />tha~ in connection with the report, a study should be made of the effects <br />on project CGsts and ono downstream water uses, of providing increased out- <br />let discharge capacity to pass neods during periods when the conservation <br />pool might be empty. Tile optimum outlet capacity to be considered would be <br />$;000 cubic feet' per second, according to the report, statement regarding <br />bsnk caving. <br /> <br />With regard to Appendix D, the irrigation report by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation, it is stated in paragraph 42, on page 1$, that the regulation <br />of existing and supplemental supplies of water for irrigation use requires <br />a conservation capacity of 55,000 acre feet in the proposed Trinidad <br />Reservoir. Also, that the maximum utilization of this capacit;, can be, <br />achieved by operation,in accordance with five basic conditions. <br /> <br />Condition Oa" proposes the transfer of the storage decree of the Model <br />Land and Irrigation ComplUlY for 20,000 'acre feet annually from the present <br />site to the site of the proposed Trinidad Reservoir. It is my understanding <br />'that such a transfer m~ be made under the Colorado statutes. However, the <br />transfer must,in effect, be consented to by all water users who might <br />be affected by the transfer. There is no statement in the report that the <br />Model Land and Irrigation Company is presently willing to attempt to make <br />the transfer, nor is any reference presented with respect to possible <br />tentative inquiries among interested water users as to the possible consumma- <br />tion of such a transfer. <br /> <br />Condition'UbUproposes the storing in the Trinidad Reservoir of flood <br />!'laws originating,on the Purgatoire River above the damsite which would <br />otherwise spill trom John Martin Reservoir. For the present purposes of <br />the report, it is suggested that a language revision be made to indicate <br />that such storage wi:1.1 be made only during periods when water is actually <br />spilling from the conservation poelin John Martin Reservoir., <br /> <br />Condition "c" proposes storage in Trinidad Reservoir of the winter <br />flaws of the Purgatoire River historically diverted for winter irrigation <br />of project lands; anli partial regulatiOn of summer flows historically <br />diverted in order to more nearly meet the seasonal distribution of irriga- <br />tion requirements, such partial regulation not to increase the total <br /> <br />APPENDIX G <br />Exhibit No. 12 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />'''''m':;..",,,,, <br /> <br />" <br />- 0<~_' .~'" .' , <br /> <br />c};;,.(<,~d' <br /> <br />:;i!~'- '-"" <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />