Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Number <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br /> <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br /> <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />44 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />49 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />52 <br />53 <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />TABLES (continued) <br /> <br />Projected water temperatures in Monks Hollow Reservoir <br />Trout sampled from the Spanish Fork River (1975) . . . <br />Trout fisheries data estimated for the Spanish Fork <br />River below its confluence with Diamond Fork (1981). <br />Trout sampled from Diamond Fork (1975) . . . . . . . . <br />Trout fisheries data estimated for Diamond Fork (1981) <br />Trout sampled from Sixth Water Creek (1975). . <br />Trout fisheries data estimated for Sixth Water Creek <br /> <br />(1981) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Trout sampled from Fifth Water Creek (1975). . <br />Trout fisheries estimated for Fifth Water Creek (1981) <br />Predicted effects of alternatives on stream trout <br />fisheries 5 years after operation begins . . . . . . <br />Trout fishery evaluation for the first year of opera- <br />tion with the Fifth Water Pumped Storage Alternative <br />Existing and predicted temperature levels in Diamond <br />Fork below Monks Hollow with operation of the <br />recommended plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Wild trout fishery evaluation for the first year of <br />operation with the 1964 DPR Alternative. . . . <br />Trout fishery evaluation for the first year of opera- <br />tion with the Sixth Water Flow Through and Pumped <br />Storage Alternative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Predicted trout productivity and angler use for major <br />project reservoirs under the various project <br />alternatives . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . <br />Baseline wildlife habitat data for 110-year evaluation <br />period . . . . . . . . . .. ..... . . . <br />Impacts on wildlife habitat caused by each project <br />alternative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Projected project changes in average annual habitat <br />units for each alternative and net changes with the <br />recommended wildlife mitigation options. . <br />Historic and projected population and growth rates for <br />Utah County and major communities. . . . . <br />Construction-related population impacts beyond the <br />baseline by community--Fifth Water Alternative <br />Population impacts in Utah County for remaining <br />alternatives (1985-91) . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Past, present, and projected employment in Utah County <br />Estimated direct, indirect, and other employment for <br />recommended plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Estimated direct, inairect, and other employment for <br />the alternative plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />Page <br />137 <br />145 <br /> <br />145 <br />146 <br />147 <br />149 <br /> <br />150 <br />152 <br />152 <br /> <br />154 <br /> <br />154 <br /> <br />156 <br /> <br />159 <br /> <br />161 <br /> <br />164 <br /> <br />168 <br /> <br />170 <br /> <br />171 <br /> <br />182 <br /> <br />185 <br /> <br />185 <br />188 <br /> <br />188 <br /> <br />190 <br />