Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00lQ~n <br /> <br />the initial deficits. Rio Blanco would be ahead of <br />that schedule, but Mesa County (with impacts but no <br />oil shale projects) would never have a surplus. <br />If the money is available at the wrong time, there <br />must be a way to get it earlier. And if in the wrong <br />place, there must be a way to get it to the right place - <br />the place with the impacts. Why is it so hard to ac- <br />complish that result? In most States the answer is <br />traceable, at least in part, to historic issues in State <br />and local government relationships. Many States <br />impose limits on local tax rates, or on the revenues <br />available to local governments, limiting their ability <br />to respond to rapid changes in service demands. <br />Furthermore, much of the new housing - in the form <br />of mobile homes - does not go on the tax rolls, but <br />is taxed as personal property or vehicles. (Note that <br />both Colorado and Wyoming have recently changed <br />their laws to tax mobile homes in the same manner <br />as permanent structures.) <br />Unique taxation formulas often complicate the <br />problem. Some States, for example, impose debt <br />limitations based on a percentage of the assessed <br />valuation. Assessment practices may delay the entry <br />of the new energy project onto the tax rolls. <br />Long.term bonds for capital projects may be diffi- <br />cult to sell. Present residents may not approve them. <br />Buyers may be wary because of untested credit ratings <br />of small communities. In some instances, a case can be <br />made for corporate or State quarantees of such bonds. <br />Finally, there are limits on the money available in <br />all State and Federal programs, and there is little <br />emphasis on communities impacted by energy develop- <br />ment. To compound the problem of State and Federal <br />assistance, most grants and allocation formulas con- <br />sider only the present population, not the boom and <br />post-boom populations. <br />The problem is particularly acute in those communi. <br />ties where deferred construction and maintenance <br />must be financed simultaneously with new growth. <br />Further, the financing for construction workers' hous. <br />ing and facilities has to begin before the final commit. <br />ment and approval for the project. I f the project <br />were to be cancelled or delayed, it would be possible <br />for the community to be stuck with facilities and no <br />project, no growth and little ability to pay back the <br />bonds. <br /> <br />B. GUIDELINES FOR FINANCING <br /> <br />In setting financial objectives and a financing plan, <br />the following points could serve as useful guidelines <br />for communities: <br /> <br />Communities should exert a full local effort, to <br />the best of their ability, to provide for new residents. <br /> <br />The financing plan should be tied to all other aspects <br />of the adopted plan for growth. Annual budgets <br />and long-range capital improvement programs <br />should be regarded as the fuel that energizes the <br />plan. <br />States can be helpful in a number of ways. - passing <br />enabling legislation that permits effective local <br />effort; in reducing inequities among communities; <br />in advancing critical front-end money - in grants <br />or loans - for planning and facilities; and in pro. <br />viding guarantee powers for local debt, where <br />appropriate. <br />The Federal Government can assist in a number of <br />ways, direct and indirect (See Chapter VI for <br />specific ideas). It shares mineral leasing and off- <br />shore oil revenues; in addition, it can emphasize <br />the impacts of energy projects in its programs. <br />A sound plan for managing growth, and understand- <br />ing of the workings of the "financial machinery" <br />at all levels will increase the likelihood of communi. <br />ties getting State and Federal money. <br />Companies will obviously contribute in the form of <br />taxes which are now standard, but they may have <br />to do more. Additional taxes may be necessary. <br />There may need to be corporate guarantee of debt, <br />prepayment of taxes and purchase of bonds or <br />notes. <br />Companies may address themselves to problems which <br />are not the responsibility of any government program, <br />for example, the recruitment of doctors. Voluntary <br />aid is very helpful, but the voluntary approach <br />alone won't do it. <br /> <br />The greatest financial need of communities with <br />energy impacts - based on actual experience - is for <br />sufficient, flexible, quick front-end money for initial <br />planning, organizing to manage growth, engineering <br />and land acquisition, and local shares to match State <br />and Federal grants. <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />C. REVENUE SOURCES AND FISCAL DEVICES <br /> <br />A number of revenue sources are available to States <br />and local governments. State legiSlation generally <br />defines the sources available to local governments, and <br />places limits on their use by cities and counties. <br />Revenue alternatives have been outlined in the Tax <br />Lead Time Study in Colorado: <br /> <br />General Sales Tax <br />Selective Sales Tax <br />Use Tax <br />Ad Valorem Property Tax <br />General Occupation Tax <br />SpeCific Occupation Tax <br />User Fees <br /> <br />30 <br />