My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10086
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP10086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:06:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.100
Description
Section D General Studies - Power
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
3/1/1976
Author
HUD
Title
Rapid Growth from Energy Projects - Ideas for State and Local Action
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00llJ3~ <br /> <br />IV. OTHER IMPACTS ON THE <br />COMMUNITY <br /> <br />The boom resulting from the construction of an <br />energy project can cause impact~ far beyond the visi- <br />ble ones of land use and the countable ones of finances. <br />In this chapter, we discuss the impacts on: <br /> <br />Quality 01 Life <br />Service to People <br />Streets and Utilities <br /> <br />The<<.e ~mpacts. are not m\J.tuaH~ exc\us\\Je horn each <br />other, or from those discussed in the previous chapter. <br />I n fact, they are all so interrelated that they cannot <br />be considered by themselves. For example, ideas to <br />improve services to people will improve the quality of <br />life, and land use planning will make easier the provision <br />of streets and utilities. The problems and ideas for <br />action presented here are only the highlights, and not <br />by any means inclusilJe. The extent of impacts and <br />the proper response depend entirely on the people of <br />the community, and thus vary from one area to <br />another. <br /> <br />A, QUALITY QF LIFE <br /> <br />Rapid growth brings rapid change in the many <br />factors that are summarized by the average citizen <br />under the heading of "quality of life:' Whether change <br />is for the better or worse depends on one's subjective <br />judgment. Many accounts of impacted communities <br />have stressed "decline" and "loss" and the negative <br />effects are often in evidence: <br /> <br />A speeded-up pace of life <br />Congestion and overcrowding <br />Inflation in prices <br />Fear of change in life style for present residents <br />Lack of activities and belonging for newcomer <br />families <br />Alcoholism and mental, health problems <br /> <br />But at the same time, more people can provide the <br />basis for more opportunity. The balance is one that <br />each community must strike in its own way. <br />The impacts are especially severe on two groups; <br /> <br />Elderly: <br />Most of the elderly have been in the community <br />for a long time, and counted on a quiet retirement <br />in a community they knew. With the rapid growth, <br />the community is no longer Quiet and may not be <br />recognizable. Many elderly are on fixed incomes, so <br />the inflation in rents and prices hits them especially <br />hard. If they are renting, it may no longer be <br />possible for them to remain in their community. <br /> <br />Wives: <br />Boom towns are often not good places for wives. <br />The wives of construction workers are mostly living <br />in "aluminum ghettos" on the fringe of urban <br />settlement. There are few jobs for women in con. <br />struction work, and the support jobs don't increase <br />as fast as the population. Activities - educational, <br />social and cultural - are limited, and there may be <br />"culture shock" for those who moved from large <br />urban centers. Schools may be crowded and recrea- <br />tion limited for their children. <br /> <br />To meet some of these problems, several ideas have <br />been advanced. Community responses in the area of <br />Quality of life have been quite limited, with few exam. <br />pies available for presentation. <br /> <br />Community Relations Commission: Denver Research <br />Institute <br />In its study of Sweetwater County, Wyoming, the <br />Denver Research Institute suggested that the county <br />might consider funding a community relations com. <br />mission. Citizen advisory committees would examine <br />new approaches to improving life in the county. <br />Among the potential ideas are: <br /> <br />Telephone referral service for information on <br />available social and governmental services; <br />Company sponsored orientation sessions, and edu- <br />cational, cultural and social activities; <br />Coordinated membership drive of all volunteer <br />organizations in the county. <br /> <br />Community relations commissions, welcome wagons, <br />hospitality hostess programs are always good buffering <br />mechanisms, easing the entry of new households into <br />a community. This may be particularly important in <br />the rapid growth community. <br /> <br />Contact: Jack Gilmore, Senior Research Economist, <br />Denver Research Institute, University of <br />Denver, Denver, Colorado 80210. <br />(303) 753-3207 <br /> <br />Recreation/Activity Center: Gillette, Wyoming <br />One of the major needs for wives is a place where <br />they can get out of the mobile home and engage in <br />activities together. Gillette has built such a center, <br />opening it in early 1975. The $1 million center in- <br />cludes a recreation area, exercise rOom, arts and crafts <br />room, classrooms, day-care center and an outdoor <br />swimming pool which can be enclosed in the winter. <br />This facility has been built CJnd is operated by <br />Campbell County to serve all the residents of the area. <br />A Federal grant from the Bureau of Outdoor Recrea- <br />tion helped. A small fee is charged for swimming and <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.