My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10077
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:06:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1948
Author
Charles A Carson
Title
Statement of Charles A Carson - Chief Counsel of Arizona Interstate Streams Commission re Colorado River Compact issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />; ..~ .l" <br /> <br />on9a7 <br /> <br />-36- <br /> <br />11 l~ <~ 4~ Ti\'inf::: in'GJ conr:i<2er8ti'Jn th8t Arizona <br /> <br />is entitleQ to all the uses of the Gl1a River as <br /> <br />set out in this p8ra::;r2,')h ( mei\nine:; the second po,ra- <br /> <br />Graph of Section ~ (a) of the Boul(',er Canyon Project <br /> <br />Act), thi:: necessaril;)' T.Jeans that Arizona is entitlec1 <br /> <br />in cddition thereto to 2,800,COO acre-feet per <br /> <br />E1.nnpfJ1. ~.!hich menns J fL1rt:1er, thAt there 1s anple <br /> <br />'rater for the Central cl.rizone. Project 'Jeco.use California <br /> <br />does not 2nd cannot 2ssert thet that Project ,~li ta~e <br /> <br />[.lOre 1!ater th8n thC1t,1I <br /> <br />I l_.70 tll l- li"-e to ~ec?(~ C', fe" IJ2rC!.:r[1.~~I1.s of that brief, be.... <br /> <br />::;innins on page 174 of the hearlngs on S, J, Res, 145. <br /> <br />*o!~i~o!~ <br /> <br />end on ~age 282 of the hearin~s on H. J. Res 225. <br /> <br />It seedS to r~e th:,t the [,r.:.;uents here a('vr-r:cec'. by Ccliforni <br /> <br />are fl;llJ, com~"letel:' , e,nG c1evCl,statinc;1y ansHerec1 '0:' that ,'ortion of <br /> <br />tho.t brief "hich I have rec,d, <br /> <br />I testified very full;)' 1Jefore thi~, CO:J'Jittee anc1, its sub- <br /> <br />cor,l;;i tt ee on S, 1175 and S. J, Res 145, anc'. before t~1e Hous e COi]!"i tt( <br /> <br />on H. J. Res 225 and I QO not believe it is necessary here to re- <br /> <br />peat its ar:::lE:lents, becE\use I l1nC,erstsnd that the fl~ll ant cOl'aplete <br /> <br />recor~ of the hearings on S. J. Res, 145 mlQ S. 1175 are before this <br /> <br />COi,ll',littee for consideration ,'it;1011t rerllointinc. I (1,0 believe that <br /> <br />the stater,lents r.mc1e by the "itnesses in favor of S, 1175 and in <br /> <br />op;:osition to S. J. Res 145 are full, cOl':lplete anc1 unanSI'Ter2ble. <br />Present Hearin~s. <br /> <br />It has been argued by the representatives of the Southern <br /> <br />C21ifornia 2e;encies in the hearin;':s 'oefore t11is COr1f:1ittee on S. 75 <br />2nc1 more fl'lly in the hearine:;s before the Fu1Jlic Landa CO:,1iili ttee <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.