My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10077
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:06:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1948
Author
Charles A Carson
Title
Statement of Charles A Carson - Chief Counsel of Arizona Interstate Streams Commission re Colorado River Compact issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.J'".. <br /> <br />,', <br /> <br />OOl'9i)t <br /> <br />-30- <br /> <br />Southern CD,lh'ornia ,'hich claiueel richts in the Colorado River, <br />fJ,:);-eared at all int erstate Deetin::;s cone ernin[; the River; anil <br />s:,ol:e in the int eres ts of their respective ae;encies, <br />In 1837 the Lec;islature of 'CaJ.1fornia created the Colorado <br />River Doar(\ of California, and restrict eel its nenbershlp to <br />representatives of the Cnlifornia agencies, The agencies were <br />the PRlo Verde Irri:ation District, the Imperial Valley District, <br />Coachella Valley County ;;ater District, the ;'etropolitan 'later <br />District of Southern California, the Depart!;:ent of Uater e, <br />Pouer of the City of Los AnGeles, aml the City of SE'.n Diego, <br />It is ny un(I,erstanelin:,: the.t the repres entati ves of thos e ngencies <br />uho siGned the Intrq-State Pri'Jrities At;reer,lent in California, <br />are still actinG in the intereGts of their respective agencies <br />2nel tryinG to carr~' out their inter-[lgency priorities agreement <br />"hich Has s i::;nee:. by them on Au~;ust 18, 1931; aml that they feel <br />bound to each other by that 2,::;reerr:ent, al thoL1Gh they (10 not <br />apparently feel boun& by the California Self_Lil11itation Statute, <br />Later, after hE,vir.g, in ,:~y o:;::>inlon, so"e"hat belateOly <br />deter,:,inec1 that they should not bring an action att2cl:in:::; the <br />valiQity of the Colorado River Compact and the California Self- <br />L1mitation Statute they gnve lip-service to those documents; <br />and yet by strained constructions 0nd ~'istin::; of "ords, they <br />trieel to avoid their plain !:lce",ling, Therefore, they hCl,ve thouCht <br />up the strainecl constructions and r1istortions l'Thich are n01. <br />being presented to Concress as substantial controversies requiring <br />iw.lec1iate aQ~uc1ication, in spite of the solemn acree':lI;mts of <br /> <br />their State i'\nc1 the ;.lain ueaninc of those a;~reeT,lents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.