Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..>., ,.j <br />.-..., <br /> <br />0\)189J <br /> <br />,;1' <br /> <br />, " <br /> <br />-~4- <br /> <br />E('c!rovec1 "itllin a total of tl10 years thereafter the Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />River CO"lpact should thereUl'lOn be aml becorJe by the t erLlS of <br /> <br />the said Chapter;?l3 ratified for and on behalf of the State of <br /> <br />Arizona. <br /> <br />I e11e'. not participate in any negotiations ui th C21ifornia <br />follmrin::; the passage of that 'Act, but I am infor~.1ed that <br />California refused to :,ali:.e such cor.;lX\ct, anel th2t no question <br />of any clElic that iJeneficial consur.lptive use of Hater should <br /> <br />be measured in an~r lTe,y other them by the resul tin,.:; llel!letion <br /> <br />of the Colorado River, end no question of any clain that <br /> <br /> <br />California should not bear pro rata her Ghare of evaporation <br /> <br />losses Here brOUGht up, l,rh1ch c:oints are ureeel by California <br />l.'itnesses nOl'T, <br /> <br />1039 to Date <br /> <br />FollOHin;::: California I s refusal to ~,lal:e such compact, I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.Tas requeoteel by the Colorado River CO;Jiss10n of Arizona c.nd <br />by the Governor of Arizona, under 2n act of the Legislature <br />authorizinG it, to attempt to ne:o'otiate l'ith the Secretary of <br />the Interior a contr~ct for the Gelivery of Arizona's share of <br /> <br />main streE',m Fater for use in Arizona, -Thich act, ~)rovided <br /> <br />that u~on the ratiiication of such 2 contr2ct the Colorado River <br /> <br />COLlpact HOulc~ be ratifie(l by Arizona, I hml attemptecl to ne- <br /> <br />~otiate such a contract in 1033-1935, 3ut California und the <br /> <br />other Busin States heel oPlJosel1 it on the :::;round that Arizona <br />