My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10077
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:06:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1948
Author
Charles A Carson
Title
Statement of Charles A Carson - Chief Counsel of Arizona Interstate Streams Commission re Colorado River Compact issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:'., <br />'..'...:\ <br />. ~ ';' <br /> <br />-:-\..'- <br />i.,.; <br /> <br />OJ1887 <br /> <br />-16... <br /> <br />str1cted to an exenl1nation of the facts alleged <br />in the proposed bill of complaint and of those <br />of wl:tl.ch ITe may take JuD.icial notice. II <br /> <br />The Court upheld both grounc1s of the [lotion to Cismiss <br /> <br />referrec1 to in the abo~e quotation; that is, the Court held <br /> <br />that there uas no Justiciable controvers~r because there was no <br /> <br />injury or threat of injury, And it also held that in that <br /> <br />character of action seekin~ an equitable a~port1orujent for <br /> <br /> <br />future use the Uni~ed States is an in0ispensable party defendant <br /> <br /> <br />and vas not joined, The Court in the course of its opinion <br /> <br />s~id ( P, 570) <br /> <br />II The decree SOUGht has no relation to any present <br />use of the lcTater thus impouml.ed "l".ich Infrinces <br />rights 'Thich Arizona ma;;' [',ssert subject to sU1Jerior <br />but unexercised ])01rerS of the Unitec. States, Of, ' <br />Wisconsin v. Illinois, 278 U. S. 367; see Arizona ~, <br />ya1ifornia, su~ra, 464; United States ~, Arizona, <br />supra, 183, ~ II <br /> <br />In the meantiilJe, Hoover Dal:J 1T8S rapidlJ nero'in:.; co;,'pletion, <br /> <br />and He in Arizona 'Jere ver:l ,.~uch concerned over the increa,se ih <br /> <br />the us e of - ,:.aters in ;;exico ;"ade IJoss!"cJle ,,1 th the encouragement, <br />assistance, anc1 to the financial benefit of the Imperial Irriga- <br /> <br />tion District of California. <br /> <br /> <br />Arizona had tried in 1925 and 1927 to get the United States <br /> <br /> <br />to notify iieXico that the United States .rould never recOGnize any <br /> <br /> <br />right in i,iexico to use any greater quanti~y of I,ater of the <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado River than i;exico Has then l!sing, California refused <br /> <br />to join in that effort, <br /> <br />Again in 1933 Arizona ;,lade an effort to persuade the <br /> <br /> <br />Uni ted States to notify Eexico that no greater use of the Ivaters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.