My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10071
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:06:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8126.700
Description
Arkansas River Coordinating Committee - Committees - Subcommittees
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/14/1975
Author
Wright Water Enginee
Title
Phreatophytes and Water Salvage
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />The amount Df water used by these plants in their transpiration varies <br /> <br />with many factors including the depth to the water table, climate, water <br /> <br />sal inity, density of growth of the species, etc. Measurements and some <br /> <br />reasonable estimates of the amount of water transpired by phreatophytes <br /> <br />are available. A single cottonwood tree three years old can use 10.3 <br /> <br />gallons per day, and a three-year old salt cedar used 13.5 gallons per day <br /> <br />during the growing season in Safford Val ley, Arizona.4 A more useful <br /> <br />measurement is on an acreage basis, which gives a better way to calculate <br /> <br />total water loss for large areas. Table 2 gives amounts of water used by <br /> <br />some phreatophytes under certain conditions in the Arkansas River Val ley <br /> <br />between Pueblo and the <br /> <br />5 <br />Co I orado-Kansas border.. For compar i son purposes, <br /> <br />Table 3 I ists typical \'Iater consumptive use by irrigated crops in the <br /> <br />Arkansas River Valley east of Pueblo.6 <br /> <br />TABLE 2 <br /> <br />ANNUAL WATER LOSS RATES IN RELATION TO WATER TABLE DEPTH <br />Water Loss Rates'" (Acre-ft. ,per Acre) <br />Depth from Surface in Feet <br /> <br />Vegetation 0-5 5-10 10-15 <br />Cottom,ood 3.3 3.0 2.5 <br />Heavy brush (salt cedar) 3.5 3.3 3.0 <br />O~,en b rus h and grass 2.0 1.6 1.2 <br />Open a re a 5 1.5 1.0 0.8 <br />Cattails to open \"a te r 4.0 <br />,', I nc 1 udes effective precipi tation <br /> <br />Althouth the above figures are high, it should be kept in mind that in <br /> <br />open areas \..,rith normal grass cover, or range lilnJ, evapotranspiration is <br /> <br />ai'proximatelyequal to the annual ~recipitation. or about I: to IS inches <br /> <br />per year. <br /> <br />,- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.