My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10064
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:05:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8112.600
Description
Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC -- Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/1/1977
Title
Technical Memorandum -- Activity 3 Phase II -- Specific Problem Analysis - 1975 National Assessment -- Arkansas-White-Red Region Part 1 of 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I C) <br />~) <br />~ <br /> ~ <br />I ~ <br />~ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Water Related Problems: <br /> <br />GROUP A PROBLEMS <br /> <br />Problems for which detailed effects information will be developed <br />and evaluated appear below. <br /> <br />As previously mentioned the major water related problems in <br />this problem area can be linked to problems associated with the <br />Red River itself. The three major problems with the river are <br />that: <br /> <br />1. The quality of Red River water is insufficient for <br />most uses. <br /> <br />2. The depth of the river is insufficient for navigation. <br /> <br />3. Flooding and bank erosion cause financial losses to <br />property owners. <br /> <br />There are other problems primarily institutional in nature in- <br />cluding the lack of an interstate agreement apportioning waters of <br />the Red River and the responsibility of local interests providing <br />spoil dikes when channel dredging is in operation. These problems <br />are also identified in tables 1 and 2. <br /> <br />Because of the high salinity content, dissolved solids, sedi- <br />ment, herbicides and pesticides, water from the Red River is unsuit- <br />able at low flow for irrigation and public supply without very ex- <br />tensive treatment. However, high flows are not dependable. Since <br />future demands on the small streams will exceed supply and because <br />of the limited availability of good quality groundwater, the Red <br />River will have to be considered the most logical source of supply. <br />At present there are no figures attached to the cost to the economy <br />of the area of the poor quality of Red River water. It most cer- <br />tainly is a hinderance to the economy of the area making irrigation <br />expensive in an area which has thousands of acres suitable for <br />irrigation. <br /> <br />The depth of the Red River is insufficient for commercial nav- <br />igation and in many months is inaufficient to support recreational <br />purauits. Water-way navigation along the Red River in ita present <br />form is nonexistent. Studies have shown that the benefits from <br />rendering the Red River navigable would exceed costs and prove <br />beneficial to the economy of the region. Approximately 16 million <br />dollars annually in navigation benefits have been forecaat for the <br />parishes included in ASA 1107. Other benefits include about 1.7 <br />million dollars in recreation benefita and about 5.2 million dollars <br />in area development. These figurea can be viewed as losses to the <br />area with the Red River in its preaent form. They do not, however, <br />take into conaideration the costs involved in rendering the Red <br />River a navigable stream. <br /> <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.