My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10064
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:05:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8112.600
Description
Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC -- Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/1/1977
Title
Technical Memorandum -- Activity 3 Phase II -- Specific Problem Analysis - 1975 National Assessment -- Arkansas-White-Red Region Part 1 of 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />CJ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />The dissolved solids of these groundwaters exceed approved standards <br />for municipal uses. Chemical analysis of the water supplies at La <br />Junta and Las Animas showed .that the dissolved solids at these two <br />municipalities were 1,660 ppm and 2,850 ppm respectively. <br /> <br />Problem Issues: <br /> <br />Water Quantity. The water supply in the area is.in~ufficient <br />to meet the requirements. There are 380,200 acres of 1rr1gated crop.. <br />land which requires an average annual withdrawal of 1,425.7 M.G.D. <br />for a supp supply (4.20 feet). The average annual supply has been <br />1,061.9 M.G.D., which includes 151.8 M.G.D. of groundwater pumpe~ from <br />the Arkansas River Alluvium. Thus, the average annual shortage 1S <br />363.8 M.G.D. (25.5 percent). The Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, when <br />operational in about 1985, will alleviate the shortage in the average <br />amount of 132.1 M.G.D. Indicative of the severity of the shortage of <br />water supply is a study of the total ditch diversion from the Arkansas <br />River to 330,000 acres of cropland, which showed that 50 percent of the <br />time. Diversions were 795 M.G.D., or a 20 percent shortage, and 10 per- <br />cent of the time, they were 503 M.G.D., for a 50 percent shortage. Dur- <br />ing years of normal streamflow there are frequently shortages late in <br />the irrigation season. <br /> <br />The water supply of the small municipal systems and the valley <br />water districts in the Arkansas River valley are insufficient to <br />adequately meet the requirements. The withdrawal of water for <br />domestic uses in the area is about 7.1 M.G.D. and the requirement <br />is 9.8 M.G.D. The problem is that La Junta, Lamar, Las Animas <br />and Rocky Ford have more than adequate water supply, while a great <br />many of the small villages and wster districts are delivering less <br />than 100 gallons per day per capita. The importation of 8.6 H.G.D. <br />by the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project is more than enough water to re- <br />place the present poor quality water and meet the area needs. How- <br />ever, it may be physically impossible to economically deliver the <br />imported water to some villages. <br /> <br />The low flows in the streams in the fall and during dry periods <br />are insufficient to sustain fisheries. There is a severe shortage <br />of water areas for water-based hunting, fishing and recreation. The <br />present need is 39,000 acres of water area in ASA 1102 and projected <br />to be 53,000 acres in 2000. The Fryingpa~-Arkansas Project and <br />John Martin Reservoir will provide an additional 9,500 water acres <br />for recreation uses. Existing privately owned irrigation reservoirs <br />have the capacity to meet these needs; however, their water levels <br />fluctuate and they, for the most part, do not maintain permanent <br />pools. The problem is to develop permenent pools for public use <br />in these private irrigation reservoirs through purchase of water <br />and cooperative agreements. <br /> <br />Water Quality. The quality of water in the Arkansas River <br />deter[orates progressively downstream below Pueblo from lack of <br />streamflow for dilution of irrigation return flows. The high salt <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.