My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10064
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:05:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8112.600
Description
Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC -- Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/1/1977
Title
Technical Memorandum -- Activity 3 Phase II -- Specific Problem Analysis - 1975 National Assessment -- Arkansas-White-Red Region Part 1 of 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br /><:;) <br />C) <br />N <br />o <br />(rJ <br />~., <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />river valley regions of the state. However, significant amounts <br />of livestock-poultry and cattle are raised in the northwest. <br />Histori~ally, agriculture has been the chief source of earnings <br />in the State, but as projections i~dicate, manufacturing is ex- <br />pected to move ahead. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Water Use (mgd) <br /> <br />Total <br />Groundwater <br />Surface water <br /> <br />1975 <br />3521 <br />1620 <br />1901 <br /> <br />1985 <br />4752 <br />1805 <br />2947 <br /> <br />2000 <br />708'f <br />2115 <br />4972 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Problem Effects: <br /> <br />1. Regional Water Export. Thia issue represents not only a <br />problem-flooding and high flows for Arkansas, but also a possible <br />solution for a problem in Texas--lack of water in high plains. <br />Arkansas' major streams have average annual flows in excess of <br />projected needs, but a number of unanswered questions remain. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br /> <br />Feasibility of flood control by export needs to be explored. <br />A study funded by the State of Texas is now underway, but is plac- <br />ing a major emphasis on developing a sourCe for Texas rather than <br />possible flooding relief for Arkansas. General design parameters <br />in present study would make it useless as a flood control measure. <br /> <br />2, Lack of Data on Groundwater Quality. At present, little <br />data on groundwater quality is available. At least as important <br />as quality is susceptability to contamination, this is also unknown <br />over most 9f the State. Knowledge of the relation between recharge <br />area development and quality is essential to protect the future. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />COLORADO <br /> <br />I <br />(J <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1, Arkansas Drainage Area above Pueblo, ASA 1102. The area <br />is the mountainous portion of the southern Rocky Mountain region, <br />drained by the Arkansas River, from the Continental Divide to <br />Pueblo, Colorado, and the Front Range and plains area drained by <br />f\>untain Creek.o' The total area is 3,591,600 acres. Elevations <br />range from over 14,000 f~et m.s.l. to 4,640 m.s.l. at Pueblo. <br />There is a wide range in the climate as is illustrated by the <br />climatic data presented in the following table: <br /> <br />Leadville <br />Pueblo <br /> <br />10,158 <br />4,640 <br /> <br />Normal <br />Precipi tat ion <br />Inches per year <br />To ta 1 Snow <br />18.5 125 <br />12.1 31 <br /> <br />Temperatures (Degrees F) <br />Max Min Mean Annual <br /> <br />82 <br />105 <br /> <br />-31 <br />-31 <br /> <br />37 <br />51 <br /> <br />'. <br />I <br /> <br />Elevl-tion <br />m.s".l. <br /> <br />Location <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.