Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 2 WRW washn x x x possible <br /> <br />They wanted to include an Indian water rights settlement for the <br />Ute Indians on the uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation in Eastern <br />Utah. "Everything was on the table but Utah's share of Colorado River <br />water and efficient use of CUP dollars," Christiansen told WRW. <br />Initially, WRW was told, neither the supporters of CUP nor the <br />environmentalists wanted to talk to the other. They were suspicious <br />of each other. But Rep. Wayne Owens, D-Utah, of Salt Lake City, whose <br />district is directly affected by CUP, then the only Democrat in the <br />five-member Congressional delegation, repeatedly urged the environ- <br />mentalists to talk to the CUP supporters. Finally they got together <br />haJtingly, gradually. CUP's need for a ceiling increase is urgent. <br />CUP was originally authorized as a $207,939,600 project within the <br />Upper Colorado River Storage project (CRSP) in the 1956 Colorado <br />River Storage Act (P.L. 84-485) providing water for irrigation and <br />municipal and industrial (M&I) uses for Central and Eastern Utah, for <br />the construction of 36.8 miles of aqueducts, other units, and four <br />power plants. Since then the ceiling on the project has been raised <br />and portions of the project have been reauthorized several times, but <br />CUP is again close to its ceiling, so a ceiling boost and reauthori- <br />zation of the project to include the agreement are imperative. <br />The new CUP ceiling in the reclamation bill that is now headed <br />for conference is $924 million, on which it is estimated $214,351,414 <br />has already been spent. CUP is the largest project within CRSP. Two <br />of the six units within CUP, the Vernal and Jensen Units in the Uinta <br />Basin of the Upper Colorado River Basin, have been completed. The <br />Bonneville Unit, the largest of the six units, involves a major di- <br />version of water from the uinta Basin to the Bonneville Basin to the <br />west where the bulk of the population in the state lives. It has been <br />under construction since 1966. It is designed to be the major compo- <br />nentof Utah's water supply in the future for both M&I and irrigation <br />water. Three other units of the project never have been built. <br />Christiansen currently is mayor of Alpine, Utah, south of Salt <br />Lake City. He initially got involved with CUP while he earlier was <br />mayor of Alpine from 1972-85, when the Bu/Rec wanted to build an <br />aqueduct system for CUP in the Alpine area paralleling an old canal <br />on the old Deer Creek project that had proved hazardous to children. <br />Alpine insisted on the BU/Rec building a big underground pipeline <br />instead. BU/Rec backed off its aqueduct plan in 1984 and built an <br />underground pipeline to move CUP water thru the area. In the mid-80's <br />the CUWCD board of directors drafted Christiansen to be general man- <br />ager of the district. After Owens' intercession with the environmen- <br />talists, Christiansen and several other representatives of water <br />districts in the Salt Lake City and County area began to talk to <br />representatives of Utah fish, wildlife and environmental interests, <br />including Kenley Brunsdale, a former Owens staffer who was chairman <br />of a Utah roundtable of environmental and outdoors groups; Jeffrey W. <br />Appel, liaison to the Utah Outdoor Coalition; Douglas Day, former <br />director of the wildlife program for the state of Utah; Fred Reimer, <br />representative of the Stonefly Fishermen, and Bill Christensen, who <br />represented an association of hunters. After negotiations had gone on <br />for a half year at the state level, they were moved to Washington. <br />(more) <br />