My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10052
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:57:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111
Description
Central Utah Participating Project
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1987
Title
Western Resources Wrap-up: 1987 & 1992
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~~ <br />~:t~. <br /> <br />,.'.J <br /> <br />page 4 WRW washn x x x 20 <br /> <br />:=====================~============================================= <br /> <br />HALL SPEARHEADS LOOK INTO BUREAU OF RECLAMATION FUTURE MISSION <br />Washington--(WRWl--His charge from Interior secretary Donald P. <br />Hodel is simple: what should be the "mission" in the future of the <br />Bureau of Reclamation in the Interior Department? <br />That is what Joe D. Hall, a former Bureau regional director in <br />Denver from 1975-80, who is now with the Western Area Power Adminis- <br />tration (WAPAl, told Western Resources Wrap-up (WRWl in an interview <br />on April 28. Hall is in charge of an experienced inter-agency six- <br />member task force studying the future role of the Bureau. <br />"The Bureau was created to reclaim the arid West" when Congress <br />undertook the federal reclamation program in 1902. "That job has <br />been done," Hall stated. Now the Interior-WAPA task force is <br />checking out possible new frontiers for the Bureau, he observed. <br />He said the task force is looking at three areas specifically. <br />First, at the way that Bureau power is generated. Should the <br />Bureau be generating power in the future? Would it be cheaper and <br />more efficient for a non-federal entity to do it? <br />Secondly, at existing water projects to determine whether they <br />should be turned over to local irrigation districts after payout. <br />WRW asked Hall whether the task force is considering possible <br />transfer of any projects to the U.s. Army Corps of Engineers. His <br />answer was negative. <br />Thirdly, at future water projects. The task force has asked the <br />Bureau regional directors to prioritize the projects that they have <br />in the planning stage and to consider what portions might be built <br />with non-federal financing, such as the hydropower facilities by the <br />new Public Power Development Corporation, for example. (See lead <br />story in this WRW.) <br />The task force is working from only two assumptions, he said. <br />It is assuming that the Bureau will continue to build multiple-pur- <br />pose projects, tho some features might be financed by non-federal <br />interests, and the power will continue to be marketed by the power <br />marketing agencies in the Department of Energy, such as WAPA and the <br />Bonneville Power Administration. <br />"The task force is going to visit all of the regional offices <br />to make a no-holds-barred evaluation of where the Bureau fits into <br />the Western water picture now and in the future. That is the mission <br />that Secretary Hodel assigned to the task force when he signed the <br />letter on March 6 providing for an evaluation of the Bureau's <br />activities. The task force is scheduled to make a report to the <br />Secretary on June 30," Hall told WRW. He underscored that the task <br />force is looking for answers, has come to no. conclusions. <br />Jeanne P. Dickman of the Washington State Water Resources <br />Association, of Yakima, Wash., questioned whether all of the West <br />has been reclaimed.. She was particularly concerned about providing <br />irr igation facili ties for another 500,000 acres in the Columbia <br />Basin Project in Eastern Washington. When it was suggested to her <br />that the sponsors should cost-share such a development, she said <br />they are willing to do so. "We should prepare for the day when we <br />are going to need additional irrigated land," she maintained. Hall <br />asked the bottom-line question in this era of farm surpluses: "Do we <br />need to build another irrigation project at this time?" HCM (more) <br /> <br />.1 <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />! <br />~ I <br /> <br />l <br />, <br /> <br />, <br />.. <br /> <br />',.' <br />!,; <br /> <br />,... <br />" <br />~ I <br /> <br />r<i. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />'< <br />:$, <br />~ <br />~ <br />~: <br />~ <br />'< <br /> <br />::~ <br /> <br />;'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.