My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10003
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP10003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:04:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.33.F
Description
15-Mile Reach (UCRBRIP)
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/9/1991
Title
15 Mile Reach Board Memos
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />but for different reasons. The overall status of the razorback <br />sucker is critical--no young razorbacks have been collected in the <br />last 27 years and the number of adult fish has sharply declined. <br />Existing information leads us to believe that the decline of the <br />razorback sucker is related to reduced spring flows. Razorbacks <br />are spring-spawners; water temperature and photoperiod initiate <br />spawning activities. Razorbacks tend to seek off-channel, flooded <br />lowland areas to spawn (where water temperatures are warmer earlier <br />in the year). High spring flows are therefore needed both to flood <br />these lowlands and to maintain the complexity of the channel which <br />provides the off-channel habitats that these fish require. <br /> <br />winter (November-Februarvl <br /> <br />wintertime is, in general, a period of low activity for fish. <br />Adult Colorado squawfish congregate in deep pools and low velocity <br />runs. Razorbacks utilize pools, eddies and runs with a preference <br />for deeper water than Colorado squawfish. The Division of Wildlife <br />shares the belief of Service researchers that winter habitat for <br />either species is not limiting their abundance at this time. Winter <br />flows volumes have generally increased over time due to irrigation <br />return flows. It has yet to be determined whether these higher <br />winter flows have a beneficial or detrimental effect on the fishes. <br />Ongoing research will refine the flow recommendations but the <br />report tentatively, recommends no reduction in winter flows below <br />historic rates in the 1,000-2,000 cfs range (the average winter <br />flow is approximately 1,400 cfs). <br /> <br />Transition months (October. Marchl <br /> <br />In terms of habitat use, October is more similar to <br />summer than to winter. The Service therefore recommended that <br />recent flow regime or the previously recommended (and accepted) <br />summer flows be maintained for October. <br /> <br />March is truly a transition month. Squawfish are moving from <br />pools where they have spent the winter, to runs. Razorbacks are <br />still in their winter mode but their use of backwater areas starts <br />to increase at this time. Water temperatures during March are <br />increasing as are the activity levels of the fish. The Service's <br />recommendation is to maintain the current March flow regime. This <br />is an area where more information should be brought to bear on <br />fine-tuning flow recommendations. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Sorinq (Aoril-Junel - Fiaure 5 <br /> <br />o Maintain the current frequency (25%) of stateline peak <br />flows in the 30,000-40,000 cfs range. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.