Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />Appendix I of the report explains the rationale for this shift in <br />methodology. An analytical model, Physical Habitat Simulation <br />(PHABSIM), was used for summer in stream flow recommendations for <br />the July-September period. A flow recommendation of 700-1200 cfs <br />was developed to maintain 95% of the total pool, riffle and run <br />habitat for adult Colorado squawfish. PHABSIM has limitations when <br />attempting to make flow recommendations for the remainder of the <br />year. Since it was developed for use in higher gradient trout <br />streams, its use is constrained in lower elevation, turbid waters <br />like the Colorado system. As a result, direct observation of <br />habitat use by fishes is not possible, and assumptions regarding <br />the fishes' use of deep water habitats, "micro-habitats", <br />backwaters, eddies, etc. must be made, leading inevitably to an <br />over-simplification of the real world scenario. The Service hopes <br />to gain greater insight into the relationship between the fishes <br />and their habitats as additional methods are applied and further <br />data become available. As an alternative to PHABSIM, the Service <br />utilized observational data (i.e., conclusions about what habitat <br />the fishes preferred based on their locations as fixed by radio- <br />telemetry) and empirical relationships (relationships between <br />numbers and flows) to develop the flow recommendations for fall, <br />winter and spring. The concerns over PHABSIM and suggestions from <br />CWCB staff (memorandum from E. I. Jencsok to George Smith, USFWS, <br />October, 1988) are factors which caused the Service to develop flow <br />recommendations using these methodologies. <br /> <br />Sorinq CAoril-Junel <br /> <br />Observations show that adult Colorado squawfish prefer complex <br />habitats during the spring (see Figure 2). The term "complex <br />habitats" refers to river segments with multiple channels, islands, <br />bars, shifting substrates, and diverse velocity distributions. <br />During spring run-off the fish seek sheltered environments where <br />water is warmer and slower. It is a widely accepted fluvial <br />geomorphologic theory that higher spring flows contribute to this <br />"channel complexity" and prevent vegetative encroachment <br />(channelization). Due to the importance of channel complexity, <br />high peak flows are necessary to maintain this key element of the <br />fishes habitat. <br /> <br />Data show that high spring flows also increase spawning <br />success and the subsequent abundance of young native fishes. For <br />example, Figure 3 illustrates that the highest catch rate for young <br />Colorado squawfish occurred in years when spring flows were high <br />(1979, 1980) and were lowest in years when spring flows were <br />relatively low (1981). High spring flows also reduce the density <br />of predatory, competing non-native fish (Figure 4). When peak <br />discharge at the Colorado/Utah stateline ranges from 30,000 to <br />40,000 cfs, the production of young squawfish in upstream sites is <br />enhanced. <br /> <br />Spring flow requirements for the razorback sucker are similar <br /> <br />3 <br />