Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />WILDERNESS REVIEW DEADLINE NEARS <br /> <br />Conservationists across the country are urging <br />President Nixon to issue an executive order which <br />would protect wild lands in the public domain after <br />the 1974 expiration of the Wilderness Act. In the <br />seven years since the passage of the Act calling for <br />review of pUblic lands to determine their wilderness <br />character, agencies involved in the study have pro- <br />gressed very slowly in cataloguing the wild areas <br />under their jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Of the 55 lil; 11; on acres whi ch were to be rev; ewed <br />by 1974, only 10 million have so far been adcted to <br />the Wilderness System, It seems unlikely that the <br />remaining 40 million acres can be completely studied <br />and recommendations for action on their proposed <br />status be presented to Con9ress by 1974 when their <br />protection from the loggers, road builders and <br />developers will run out. Many conservationists feel <br />that the Forest Service in particular has deliberately <br />gone slow in holding public hearings on the lands it <br />controls with the hope that delaying tactics will <br />prevent wilderness status from locking up timber <br />resources. <br /> <br />The draft executive order also provides protection <br />for de facto wilderness areas which were not covered <br />at all in the 1964 Wilderness Act. Interim protection <br />would be given to previously unclassified areas <br />which appear to have a wilderness character until <br />the President and Congress have decided on the <br />suitability of the wilderness designation. <br /> <br />Progress on Colorado areas has been good, con- <br />trary to the national trend, and both conservationists <br />and Forest Service representatives are hopeful that <br />all areas will be reviewed by the 1974 deadline. <br /> <br />RECREATION AREA FOR SAWTOOTH FAVORED <br /> <br />Hearin9s were held June 7 and 8 on H,R,6957, a <br />bill to establish a r~ational Recreation Area in the <br />Sawtooth-White Clouds area of Central Idaho, The <br />Idaho Congressional delegation has introduced the <br />bill which calls for the establishment of a <br />re 1 at i ve 1y sma 11 rec rea ti on a rea. ra ther than the <br />1.4 million-acre national park concept I....hich is <br />favored by some conservationists. One danger some <br />see in H,R, 6957 is that it would not affect <br />existing mining claims. Several companies contem- <br />plate future open pit operations in the area. <br /> <br />At the June hearings, however. many conserva- <br />tionists testified in favor of the bill. They feel <br />that it would give some degree of protection to the <br />area immediately while the National Park Service is <br />preparing a proposal for giving park status to the <br />region. The bi 11 provides a five-year moratorium <br />on location and entry of new mining claims, and it <br />subjects operations on existing clalms to regula- <br />tion by the uepartments of Agriculture and Interior. <br />In addition. this bill appears to have a good chance <br />of passing both the House and Senate. Legislation <br />proposed in previous years has always stalled in the <br />House. <br /> <br />STATUS REPORT <br /> <br />He 11 s Canyon <br /> <br />Governors of Idaho. Washington and <br />Oregon join conservationists to <br />protest possible construction of <br />dams on Snake River; Senate has <br />approved bill prohibiting dams for <br />7 years. <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Glenwood <br /> <br />1-70 Colorado Division of Highways pub- <br />lishes draft environmental statement <br />analyzing impact of construction On <br />canyon and Cottonwood Pass routes. <br />Copies may be examined at ROMCOE, <br />Highway Division headquarters in <br />Denver and Glenwood Springs, and <br />Garfield, Ea91e, Pitkin County court- <br />houses. Comments on statement are due <br />at Division office in Grand Junction <br />(606 5, Ninth Street) by Nov, 30. <br />Date of public hearing in late fall <br />not set. <br /> <br />1 99 <br /> <br />Nevada State Board of Health refuses <br />to allow Colorado River standards <br />variance for Marina Vegas development. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION IN COLORADO GETS <br />FEDERAL BOOST <br />The Master Advisory Plannin9 Council (HAPC) has re- <br />ceived a $40,800 9rant from the U,S, 1ffice of Educa' <br />tion for the purpose of developing a master,plan for <br />Colorado environmental and ecologicill education. <br /> <br />Mari na Vegas <br /> <br />MAPC, an informally structured group organized in <br />;.lay of this year to apply for the grant, has members <br />representi ng many segments of Colorado soc; ety <br />although attempts are underway to get broader geo- <br />graphical representation. While t~APC retains con- <br />trol of the funds and will have an advisory and re- <br />vie\....ing function, the actual plan preparation ';/ill be <br />done by a staff under the supervision of the Center <br />for Research and Education (CRE), CRE worked with <br />the Colorado Oepartment of Education (COE) during 1970 <br />in developing the preliminary environmental education <br />concept on which the MAPC grant application was based. <br />ROMCOE assisted CRE and COE in the or9anization of <br />MAPC, <br /> <br />Richard Raccio assumed the duties of Project <br />Oirector on August 1, The CRE office is at 2150 <br />S. Bellaire Street in Denver. The first job of the <br />staff will be to establish a network of contacts <br />throughout the state and to make an inventory of <br />envi ronrnenta 1 educati on opportuni ti es tha tal reaJy <br />exist. The aim of the state master plan is to outline <br />ways by which environmental education can be made a <br />part of the traditional education system as well as of <br />the informal education process which takes place out- <br />side of the academic community. Upon completion of <br />the master plan and approval of it by r~APC in the <br />sprin9 of 1972, attempts will be made to get state and <br />federal funding for its implementation. <br /> <br />Other grants made in the Rocky Mountain region were: <br />(1) $50,000 to the Social Science Education Consortium <br />of Boulder. Colorado for curriculum development; <br />(2) $18,000 to the Falls Creek Environmental Education I <br />Foundation in Missoula, Montana for community environ- <br />mental education; (3) $3,000 to the College of Idaho <br />in Caldwell for curriculum development; and (4) $7,000 <br />to the Wyoming Cornmi ttee for Community Environmental <br />Awareness and Act;on, Division of Adult Education of <br />the University of Wyoming in Laramie for dissemination <br />of information. <br /> <br />The 1972 appropriation for the Environmental Educa- <br />tion Act is $3.5 million. The "Handbook on Preparing <br />Proposals" to assist applicants for grants in 1972 <br />may be obtained from the Office of Environmental Educa- <br />tion. Office of Priority Management, Office of Educa- <br />tion, Washington, D,C. 20202, The deadline for sub- <br />mission of proposals will be announced in the fall. <br />Two thousand applications were submitted in 1971, and <br />71 were approved. <br />