My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09987
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:42:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:02:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8059
Description
Section D General Studies-State Water Plan
State
CO
Date
4/22/1971
Title
Environmental Considerations-The Denver Post-Colorado a Sellout-Why Sell Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />WHY <br /> <br />SI, <br /> <br />THE <br />THE <br /> <br />BIGGER, <br />BETTER? <br /> <br />Colorado is growing - it is the 7th fastest <br />growing state in the union - yet one can <br />rightly ask. "Growing Into What?" In the <br />last 10 years CoJor.ldo's population grew <br />25.8%. only l.::!% under California's rate <br />for the same period. Historically, growth <br />has been looked upon as an unqualified good, <br />but recently the growth ethic has been severely <br />challenged. Increasingly. people are asking <br />who benefits when we "Sell Colorado"? <br /> <br />Few of us want to live in another Los <br />Angeles. Yct projections for the front range <br />.show a MEGOPOUS extending from Fort <br />Collins to Pueblo in a URBANIZATION <br />FEW short years. The PROJECTIONS . <br />Chamber of Commerce "tal <br />nlellta1/y promotes tillS in- ==t;.'.,~ _ <br />crease in industriJ:l growth - ft.., _ <br />as providing "A growing f . <br />tax base" as if it reduces ~ \<. <br />~e aV~~f~,~~~enci:~";:~ I~.-'I <br /> <br />Commission justifies dig- <br />ging into taxpayer's <br />pockets because "it will, <br />after all, promote Colo- <br />rado." If more people <br />and more industry meant <br />lower taxes, surely Los <br />, <br />An!,oeles and New York <br />would have the lowest per :t <br />capita taxes.. They do not, lil. ...,- ..I <br />. STATE PLANNING <br />they have the highest. OFFICE <br />Beyond a certain point, ,growth dot.'S not <br />benefit the average citizen. Many areas, as <br />the San Luis Valley, need growth, but the <br />Front Range does not need growth to benefit <br />the a...-.:rage ..::ituen. Growth may be beneficial <br />to you if you own a lot of real estate, but <br />for ALL of us it will mean our Jives will <br />become more congested, more restrict('d, <br />with less access to ret::reational facilities and <br />we will be subjected to a more over-organized <br />and dominant go\'emment. <br /> <br />. <br />""== <br />J, <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />THE COSTS OF GROWTH <br />It 0 will also likely mean higher taxes. <br />Stu~les are Showing that to a certain point, <br />a city or other geographic area can utilize <br />the ec~nomies of scale and provide services <br />at a falfly Jow per capita cost. But contrary <br />to popular notions. this process has its limits <br />and beyond t.hose 1i~ts we are getting int~ <br />wh~t .economl~ts are mcre~singJy recognizing <br />as 0 dl~conomlcs of scale.' Beyond a Certain <br />pomt m population growth there are NO <br />cos.t ~vings derhoed from large scale economic <br />~ct1VJt.les, and yet the need for services <br />lDtenSlfies. ln other words, there is a need <br /> <br />~6's <br />.; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.