Laserfiche WebLink
<br />combined with the filling (or almost filling) of altupstream reservoirs and a 2,297 MCM <br />(1.862 MAF) gain in storage in Lake Mead, is enough to eliminate most of the storage <br />deficit that has accumulated over the 6 previous drought years, It is expected that over <br />8,680 MCM (7,036 MAF) of storage will be gained in water year 1993, It is now <br />estimated that 2 normal flow years would completely fill the system, During 1993, all <br />deliveries of water to meet obligations pursuant to "The Law of the River" were <br />maintained. Tables 1(a) and 1(b) list the expected October 1, 1993, reservoir vacant <br />space, live storage,' water elevation, percent of capacity, change in storage, and change in <br />elevation during water year '1993. <br /> <br />1994 WATER SUPPLY ASSUMPTIONS <br /> <br />For 1994 operations, three reservoir unregulated'inflow scenarios were developed and <br />analyzed and are labeled as probable maximum, most probable, and probable minimum. <br />The attached graphs show these inflow scenarios, and associated release patterns, end of <br />month contents, and end of month elevations for each reservoir, <br /> <br />The National Weather Service Extended Streamnow Prediction (ESP) computer model <br />uses current basin conditions as well as historical data to predict the range of possible <br />future streamflows, The ESP model was employed to develop each inflow scenario, <br />based on current soil moisture conditions within:the basin. Although there is a wide <br />confidence band associated with streamflow forecasts made a year in advance, the data <br />are valuable in analyzing the possible impacts on project uses and purposes. Due to the <br />above average year that was experienced in 1993, the soil moisture deficit has been <br />erased and therefore the magnitude of inflows in the three scenarios are equal to the <br />historical upper decile, mean, and lower decile (1.0 percent exceedance, SO percent <br />exceedance, and 90 percent exceedance, respectively) for each reservoir, <br /> <br />Based on the ESP model results, three different hydrologic scenarios were developed for <br />each reservoir. The three inflow scenarios for Lake Powell are shown in Tables 2(a) and <br />2(b), <br /> <br />The volume of inflow resulting from these assumptions was used as input into <br />Reclamation's monthly reservoir simulation model. This model is used to plan reservoir <br />operations for the upcoming l2-month period, 'Projected water year 1994 inflow and. <br />June 30, 1993, reservoir storage conditions were used as input to this model and monthly <br />releases were adjusted until release and storage levels accomplished project purposes and <br />priorities, <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />I <br />.' <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />t <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.- <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />-, <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />., <br />I <br />